Water- in- Oil Emulsion Temporal and Spatial Evolution at Static Conditions and Its Impact on Pipeline Restart

Understanding emulsion evolution at static conditions is crucial for production operations, such as pipeline operations during the shut- in and restart process and separator optimal design. This study experimentally investigated the temporal and spatial evolution of water- in- oil emulsion properties under static conditions. Numerical simulations were conducted to study their impacts on pipeline restart operations. The experiments were conducted in graduated glass cylinders, with mineral oil and tap water as the testing fluids and Span (R) 80 as the surfactant. Different water cuts, mixing speeds, and surfactant concentrations were investigated. Along with idle time at static conditions, the mixture demonstrated two layers, namely an upper oil layer and a lower emulsion layer, except for the lowest surfactant concentration that gave a third additional free- water layer at the bottom. Experimental results showed a dramatic increase in viscosity in the emulsion layer with time and depth, which was closely related to the increase in the water volumetric fraction. The increase rate slowed down and plateaued out with time. The increase rate is also related to water cut, mixing speed, and surfactant concentration. Experimental results also show that the relationships between the viscosity and water cut for separated emulsion follow the master curve of viscosity and water cut for homogeneous emulsion. This suggests that one can estimate the viscosity using the master curve given the water volumetric fraction. The numerical simulation was conducted for pipelines with a valley configuration and with the fluid properties obtained from the experimental measurements. It demonstrates that a higher pressure is required to restart the flow to the original flow rate. It also shows that the flow rate may not be able to resume its original value given the same pressure boundaries due to the accumulation of dense emulsion layers in the horizontal and upward inclined sections. For example, for a 16- m pipe, the flow cannot be restarted given the same inlet pressure (100 Pa). It can only resume 4.6% of the original flow rate when the pressure is elevated to 300 Pa.