Analysis of the population viability of Rhea pennata in Peru

被引:1
作者
Chambi, Willy Maldonado [1 ]
Farfan, Diana Felicitas Beltran [2 ]
机构
[1] Wildlife Conservat Soc WCS, Calle Chiclayo 1008 Miraflores, Lima, Peru
[2] Univ Nacl Altiplano, Fac Ciencias Biol, Av Floral 1153, Puno, Peru
来源
REVISTA PERUANA DE BIOLOGIA | 2024年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
Conservation; extinction; distribution; repopulation; habitat; Suri;
D O I
10.15381/rpb.v31i2.25767
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this work, a population viability analysis (PVA) is conducted on the population of Rhea pennata , a bird categorized as Critically Endangered (CR), with an estimated population size of 350 individuals in Peru. The data were analyzed using VORTEX 9.6 software, and eight scenarios and combinations were modeled to determine the annual population growth rate under the influence of anthropogenic, demographic, environmental, and genetic factors. The results indicate that the Rhea pennata po - pulation is not viable, with a negative population growth rate (r= -0.11), meaning the population decreases by 11% per year. A combined effect of anthropogenic factors, such as egg collection, genetic factors like inbreeding, and environmental factors such as intense snowfalls, further reduces the growth rate (r= -0.18). In this scenario, the probability of extinction occurs in approximately 50 years. The effect of inbreeding in an adult population of 50 individuals in a fragmented habitat would lead to extinction in approximately 25 to 30 years. The only scenario where the population is viable in the long term involves repopulation, requiring the release of 38 population groups over a period of 15 years in an area of approximately 27000 km 2 , which must be under some conservation measure, such as protected natural areas or other area -based conservation measures.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Akcakaya H. Resit, 2000, Ecological Bulletins, V48, P23
[2]  
Angulo Pratolongo Fernando, 2004, Ecol. apl., V3, P112
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1, VSecond
[4]   Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool [J].
Bachman, Steven ;
Moat, Justin ;
Hill, Andrew W. ;
de la Torre, Javier ;
Scott, Ben .
ZOOKEYS, 2011, (150) :117-126
[5]  
Barrio Javier, 2007, Rev. peru biol., V14, P193
[6]   Home range of greater and lesser rhea in Argentina: relevance to conservation [J].
Bellis, LM ;
Martella, MB ;
Navarro, JL ;
Vignolo, PE .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2004, 13 (14) :2589-2598
[7]  
Bello R, 2014, Establecimiento de un grupo de monos arana (Ateles chamek) reintroducidos y monitoreados mediante radio telemetria en el sureste de la amazonia peruana. Programa de Rehabilitacion y reintroduccion del mono arana, Ateles chamek (humboldt, 1812), en el suereste de la amazonia peruana
[8]  
Berkunsky I, 2015, Proyecto de reintroduccion experimental de Muitu (Crax fasciolata) y Guacamayo Rojo (Ara chloropterus) en la Reserva Natural Ibera
[9]  
Carrillo L, 2003, Taller de Conservacion de Aguila Arpia Analisis de Viabilidad de Poblacion y Habitat para el Aguila Arpia (Harpia harpyja) en la Selva Maya
[10]  
Cruz A, 2013, Memoria Segundo Encuentro de Investigadores Ambientales julio de 2013