Factors Associated With Outcomes of Facial Reconstruction After Mohs Micrographic Surgery

被引:0
作者
Ji, Jenny [1 ]
Alexander, Nora [1 ]
Enin, Kwasi [1 ]
Spataro, Emily [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Facial Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63141 USA
关键词
mohs micrographic surgery; facial reconstruction; outcomes; complications; DELAYED RECONSTRUCTION; COMPLICATIONS; FOREHEAD; FLAP; HEAD;
D O I
10.1177/19433875241257981
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To determine patient, defect, and surgical factors associated with facial reconstructive outcomes. Methods: Post-Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) facial reconstructions performed at a single institution between 2015-2020 were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, defect characteristics, type and timing of reconstruction, and postoperative complications and revisions were collected. Data was analyzed with multivariable logistic regressions. Results: 245 defects in 220 patients (median age 66 years, 143 (65%) female) were included. Most were located on the nose (68%), and median size was 3.0 cm(2) (IQR 1.32-7.5 cm(2)). Defect size over 10 cm(2) (OR 5.176, 95% CI 1.353-19.808) and two-staged melolabial flaps (OR 4.021, 95% CI 1.525-10.603) were associated with complications after univariate analysis. Nasal tip defects (OR 2.324, 95% CI 1.076-5.019) were associated with minor revisions. Major revisions were associated with nasal sidewall (OR 2.873, 95% CI 1.125-7.336) and tip (OR 2.780, 95% CI 1.145-6.749) defects, ear cartilage grafts (OR 3.373, 95% CI 1.382-8.231), two-staged paramedian forehead flaps (OR 19.273, 95% CI 6.864-54.112), and delayed reconstruction over 14 days (OR 5.727, 95% CI 1.298-25.281). On multivariable analysis, defect size over 10 cm(2) (aOR 4.972, 95% CI 1.286-19.073) and two-staged melolabial flaps (aOR 4.575, 95% CI 1.628-12.857) were independently associated with complications, while two-staged paramedian forehead flaps (aOR 14.421, 95% CI 3.976-52.310) were independently associated with major revisions. Conclusions: More complex reconstructions with larger defects and interpolated flaps were associated with revision surgery and complications of facial reconstruction following MMS.
引用
收藏
页码:NP131 / NP137
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Anderson Kristin, 2012, J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec, V4, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.jccw.2014.03.001
  • [2] [Anonymous], Mohs Surgery
  • [3] Cook JL, 2005, DERMATOL SURG, V31, P1409
  • [4] Complications of cutaneous surgery in patients taking clopidogrel-containing anticoagulation
    Cook-Norris, Robert H.
    Michaels, Jason D.
    Weaver, Amy L.
    Phillips, P. Kim
    Brewer, Jerry D.
    Roenigk, Randall K.
    Otley, Clark C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 65 (03) : 584 - 591
  • [5] Skin Necrosis Following Rhinoplasty: A Review and Proposed Strategy on Identifying High-Risk Patients
    Ferzli, George
    Araslanova, Rakhna
    Sukato, Daniel
    Romo, Thomas
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 37 (04) : 543 - 549
  • [6] The Interpolated Paranasal Flap: A Novel and Advantageous Option for Nasal-Alar Reconstruction
    Fisher, Galen H.
    Cook, Joel W.
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (04) : 656 - 661
  • [7] Forehead flap in nasal reconstruction
    Friduss, M
    Dagum, P
    Mandych, A
    Reppucci, A
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1995, 113 (06) : 740 - 747
  • [8] CIGARETTE-SMOKING AND FLAP AND FULL-THICKNESS GRAFT NECROSIS
    GOLDMINZ, D
    BENNETT, RG
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1991, 127 (07) : 1012 - 1015
  • [9] Examining Preoperative Expectations and Postoperative Satisfaction in Rhinoplasty Patients: A Single-Center Study
    Kandathil, Cherian K.
    Patel, Priyesh N.
    Spataro, Emily A.
    Most, Sam P.
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2021, 23 (05) : 375 - 382
  • [10] Complications With Forehead Flaps in Nasal Reconstruction
    Little, Stewart C.
    Hughley, Brian B.
    Park, Stephen S.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2009, 119 (06) : 1093 - 1099