Mapping the Evidence on the Impact of mHealth Interventions on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Frid, Santiago [1 ]
Amat-Fernandez, Clara [2 ]
Fuentes-Exposito, Maria Angeles [3 ]
Munoz-Mateu, Montserrat [4 ]
Valachis, Antonis [5 ]
Siso-Almirall, Antoni [6 ]
Grau-Corral, Immaculada [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Clin Informat Serv, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp Mar Res Inst, Hlth Serv Res Grp, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Fdn iSYS, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Oncol Serv, Barcelona, Spain
[5] Orebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Oncol, ?, Orebro, Sweden
[6] Univ Barcelona, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Hosp Clin Barcelona, mHlth & Digital Hlth Observ, Barcelona, Spain
来源
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS | 2024年 / 8卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
HEALTH INTERVENTIONS; CHEMOTHERAPY; EHEALTH;
D O I
10.1200/CCI.24.00014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSETo comprehensively synthesize the existing evidence concerning mHealth interventions for patients with breast cancer (BC).DESIGNOn July 30, 2023, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar for articles using the following inclusion criteria: evaluation of mHealth interventions in patients with cancer, at least 30 participants with BC, randomized control trials or prospective pre-post studies, determinants of health (patient-reported outcomes [PROs] and quality of life [QoL]) as primary outcomes, interventions lasting at least 8 weeks, publication after January 2015. Publications were excluded if they evaluated telehealth or used web-based software for desktop devices only. The quality of the included studies was analyzed with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.RESULTSWe included 30 studies (20 focused on BC), encompassing 5,691 patients with cancer (median 113, IQR, 135.5). Among these, 3,606 had BC (median 99, IQR, 75). All studies contained multiple interventions, including physical activity, tailored information for self-management of the disease, and symptom tracker. Interventions showed better results on self-efficacy (3/3), QoL (10/14), and physical activity (5/7). Lifestyle programs (3/3), expert consulting (4/4), and tailored information (10/11) yielded the best results. Apps with interactive support had a higher rate of positive findings, while interventions targeted to survivors showed worse results. mHealth tools were not available to the public in most of the studies (17/30).CONCLUSIONmHealth interventions yielded heterogeneous results on different outcomes. Identifying lack of evidence on clinical scenarios (eg, patients undergoing systemic therapy other than chemotherapy) could aid in refining strategic planning for forthcoming research endeavors within this field. Review of mHealth impact on breast cancer, highlighting benefits and guiding future research.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of pharmacist interventions on patients' adherence to antidepressants and patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review
    Al-Jumah, Khalaf Ali
    Qureshi, Naseem Akhtar
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2012, 6 : 87 - 100
  • [2] Interventions for Concerning Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
    Gianluca Sampieri
    Huaqi Li
    Philopateer Ataalla
    Kaitlyn Merriman
    Christopher W. Noel
    Julie Hallet
    Natalie Coburn
    Irene Karam
    Martin Smoragiewicz
    Brian Wong
    Rui Fu
    Antoine Eskander
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2024, 31 : 1148 - 1170
  • [3] Interventions for Concerning Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
    Sampieri, Gianluca
    Li, Huaqi
    Ataalla, Philopateer
    Merriman, Kaitlyn
    Noel, Christopher W.
    Hallet, Julie
    Coburn, Natalie
    Karam, Irene
    Smoragiewicz, Martin
    Wong, Brian
    Fu, Rui
    Eskander, Antoine
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 2078 - 2089
  • [4] Impact of Technology-Based Interventions on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Asthma: A Systematic Review
    Doshi, Hiten
    Hsia, Brian
    Shahani, Jai
    Wenzhu, Mowrey
    Jariwala, Sunit P.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (06): : 2336 - 2341
  • [5] Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of survival in patients with bowel cancer: a systematic review
    Claudia Rutherford
    Rachel Campbell
    Kate White
    Madeleine King
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 2871 - 2887
  • [6] PREDICTORS OF PATIENT-REPORTED PHYSICAL OUTCOMES IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Rutte, A.
    Dekker, J.
    Braamse, A. M. J.
    Bomhof-Roordink, H.
    Mulder, C. J. J.
    Droste, J. S. Terhaar Sive
    Verheul, H. M. W.
    Ostelo, R. W. J. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 21 : S149 - S150
  • [7] Acupuncture for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Zhang, Yuzhu
    Sun, Yang
    Li, Dongmei
    Liu, Xiaoyuan
    Fang, Chen
    Yang, Chunmin
    Luo, Tianyu
    Lu, Hai
    Li, Huachao
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Liang, Qianyi
    Wu, Jiahua
    Huang, Limei
    Xu, Rui
    Ren, Liping
    Chen, Qianjun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [8] Patient-reported outcomes as predictors of survival in patients with bowel cancer: a systematic review
    Rutherford, Claudia
    Campbell, Rachel
    White, Kate
    King, Madeleine
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (11) : 2871 - 2887
  • [9] Patient-reported outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for endometrial cancer survivors: a systematic review
    Ashley Buchanan
    McKenzie Roddy
    Hoda Badr
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2021, 15 : 526 - 535
  • [10] Patient-reported outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for endometrial cancer survivors: a systematic review
    Buchanan, Ashley
    Roddy, McKenzie
    Badr, Hoda
    JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2021, 15 (04) : 526 - 535