How and why eLife selects papers for peer review

被引：0
|
作者：
Behrens, Timothy E.
Dalal, Yamini
Harper, Diane M.
Weigel, Detlef
Ajijola, Olujimi A.
Andreotti, Amy H.
Araujo, Sofia J.
Banerjee, Utpal
Bhargava, Balram
Bi, Yanchao
Buchel, Christian
Campelo, Felix
Cardona, Albert
Cheah, Kathryn
Chen, Lu
Choi, Murim
Colgin, Laura
Cooper, Jonathan A.
Cui, Qiang
de Lange, Floris
Desplan, Claude
Doetsch, Volker
El-Deiry, Wafik S.
Franco, Eduardo
Frank, Michael J.
Garrett, Wendy S.
Gold, Joshua, I
Hauf, Silke
Huang, Christopher L-H
Huguenard, John
James, David E.
Kana, Bavesh
Kapahi, Pankaj
King, Andrew J.
Kleine-Vehn, Juergen
Kornmann, Benoit
Liu, Caigang
Luo, Huan
Maduke, Merritt
Makin, Tamar
Marquand, Andre F.
Marston, Adele L.
Mistry, Pramod
Moses, Alan
Nelson, Sacha B.
Ng, Tony
Ojala, Paivi
Perry, George H.
Poirazi, Panayiota
Postovit, Lynne-Marie
机构：
来源：
ELIFE | 2024年 / 13卷
关键词：
scientific publishing; peer review; preprints; research assessment; research communication;
D O I：
10.7554/eLife.100571
中图分类号：
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
When deciding which submissions should be peer reviewed, eLife editors consider whether they will be able to find high-quality reviewers, and whether the reviews will be valuable to the scientific community.
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the money value of peer review
    Copiello, Sergio
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 115 (01) : 613 - 620
  • [42] Publishing and Peer Review / Fundamentals of Peer Review
    O'Hara, Corey M.
    Hoffman, Daniel J.
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2023, 79 : 253 - 253
  • [43] Peer review time: How late is late in a small medical journal?
    Kljakovic-Gaspic, M
    Hren, D
    Marusic, A
    Marusic, M
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 34 (05) : 439 - 443
  • [44] How to Write a Peer Review: 12 things you need to know
    Wilkinson, Jo
    Pardal-Pelaez, Beatriz
    REVISTA ORL, 2018, 9 (04): : 291 - 293
  • [45] How to Stop Collusion in Peer Review Exercises: Evidence From the Classroom
    Anirban Ghatak
    Resonance, 2022, 27 : 867 - 875
  • [46] How peer-review constrains cognition: on the frontline in the knowledge sector
    Cowley, Stephen J.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
  • [47] How Editors Decide. Oral Communication in Journal Peer Review
    Hirschauer, Stefan
    HUMAN STUDIES, 2015, 38 (01) : 37 - 55
  • [48] How Editors Decide. Oral Communication in Journal Peer Review
    Stefan Hirschauer
    Human Studies, 2015, 38 : 37 - 55
  • [49] How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    Salgado, Teresa M.
    Tonin, Fernanda S.
    PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2020, 18 (01):
  • [50] How to Stop Collusion in Peer Review Exercises: Evidence From the Classroom
    Ghatak, Anirban
    RESONANCE-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2022, 27 (05): : 867 - 875
12345