How and why eLife selects papers for peer review

被引：0
|
作者：
Behrens, Timothy E.
Dalal, Yamini
Harper, Diane M.
Weigel, Detlef
Ajijola, Olujimi A.
Andreotti, Amy H.
Araujo, Sofia J.
Banerjee, Utpal
Bhargava, Balram
Bi, Yanchao
Buchel, Christian
Campelo, Felix
Cardona, Albert
Cheah, Kathryn
Chen, Lu
Choi, Murim
Colgin, Laura
Cooper, Jonathan A.
Cui, Qiang
de Lange, Floris
Desplan, Claude
Doetsch, Volker
El-Deiry, Wafik S.
Franco, Eduardo
Frank, Michael J.
Garrett, Wendy S.
Gold, Joshua, I
Hauf, Silke
Huang, Christopher L-H
Huguenard, John
James, David E.
Kana, Bavesh
Kapahi, Pankaj
King, Andrew J.
Kleine-Vehn, Juergen
Kornmann, Benoit
Liu, Caigang
Luo, Huan
Maduke, Merritt
Makin, Tamar
Marquand, Andre F.
Marston, Adele L.
Mistry, Pramod
Moses, Alan
Nelson, Sacha B.
Ng, Tony
Ojala, Paivi
Perry, George H.
Poirazi, Panayiota
Postovit, Lynne-Marie
机构：
来源：
ELIFE | 2024年 / 13卷
关键词：
scientific publishing; peer review; preprints; research assessment; research communication;
D O I：
10.7554/eLife.100571
中图分类号：
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
When deciding which submissions should be peer reviewed, eLife editors consider whether they will be able to find high-quality reviewers, and whether the reviews will be valuable to the scientific community.
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
12345