How and why eLife selects papers for peer review

被引：0
|
作者：
Behrens, Timothy E.
Dalal, Yamini
Harper, Diane M.
Weigel, Detlef
Ajijola, Olujimi A.
Andreotti, Amy H.
Araujo, Sofia J.
Banerjee, Utpal
Bhargava, Balram
Bi, Yanchao
Buchel, Christian
Campelo, Felix
Cardona, Albert
Cheah, Kathryn
Chen, Lu
Choi, Murim
Colgin, Laura
Cooper, Jonathan A.
Cui, Qiang
de Lange, Floris
Desplan, Claude
Doetsch, Volker
El-Deiry, Wafik S.
Franco, Eduardo
Frank, Michael J.
Garrett, Wendy S.
Gold, Joshua, I
Hauf, Silke
Huang, Christopher L-H
Huguenard, John
James, David E.
Kana, Bavesh
Kapahi, Pankaj
King, Andrew J.
Kleine-Vehn, Juergen
Kornmann, Benoit
Liu, Caigang
Luo, Huan
Maduke, Merritt
Makin, Tamar
Marquand, Andre F.
Marston, Adele L.
Mistry, Pramod
Moses, Alan
Nelson, Sacha B.
Ng, Tony
Ojala, Paivi
Perry, George H.
Poirazi, Panayiota
Postovit, Lynne-Marie
机构：
来源：
ELIFE | 2024年 / 13卷
关键词：
scientific publishing; peer review; preprints; research assessment; research communication;
D O I：
10.7554/eLife.100571
中图分类号：
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
When deciding which submissions should be peer reviewed, eLife editors consider whether they will be able to find high-quality reviewers, and whether the reviews will be valuable to the scientific community.
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals
    Marcel Ausloos
    Olgica Nedič
    Aleksandar Dekanski
    Scientometrics, 2019, 119 : 279 - 302
  • [22] Correlations between submission and acceptance of papers in peer review journals
    Ausloos, Marcel
    Nedic, Olgica
    Dekanski, Aleksandar
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 119 (01) : 279 - 302
  • [23] Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
    Patel, Jigisha
    BMC MEDICINE, 2014, 12
  • [24] Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
    Jigisha Patel
    BMC Medicine, 12
  • [25] Peer review in scholarly publishing part A: why do it?
    Koshy, Kiron
    Fowler, Alexander J.
    Gundogan, Buket
    Agha, Riaz A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 3 (02):
  • [26] Writing and contribution of geography papers from the perspective of peer review
    Li J.
    He S.
    Zhu X.
    Zhu, Xiaohua (zhuxh@igsnrr.ac.cn), 1717, Science Press (72): : 1717 - 1728
  • [27] Practical Suggestions on How to Move From Peer Review to Peer Learning
    Donnelly, Lane F.
    Larson, David B.
    Heller, Richard E., III
    Kruskal, Jonathan B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (03) : 578 - 582
  • [28] Referees' attitudes toward open peer review and electronic transmission of papers
    Melero, R
    López-Santoveña, F
    FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 7 (06) : 521 - 527
  • [29] Peer review
    Kemerink, Martijn
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS-REVUE D HISTOIRE DU DROIT-THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2019, 87 (03): : 291 - 298
  • [30] Medico Scientific Literature Peer Review: How Relevant Is It?
    Misra, Basant Kumar
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 76 (1-2) : 39 - 40
12345