How and why eLife selects papers for peer review

被引：0
|
作者：
Behrens, Timothy E.
Dalal, Yamini
Harper, Diane M.
Weigel, Detlef
Ajijola, Olujimi A.
Andreotti, Amy H.
Araujo, Sofia J.
Banerjee, Utpal
Bhargava, Balram
Bi, Yanchao
Buchel, Christian
Campelo, Felix
Cardona, Albert
Cheah, Kathryn
Chen, Lu
Choi, Murim
Colgin, Laura
Cooper, Jonathan A.
Cui, Qiang
de Lange, Floris
Desplan, Claude
Doetsch, Volker
El-Deiry, Wafik S.
Franco, Eduardo
Frank, Michael J.
Garrett, Wendy S.
Gold, Joshua, I
Hauf, Silke
Huang, Christopher L-H
Huguenard, John
James, David E.
Kana, Bavesh
Kapahi, Pankaj
King, Andrew J.
Kleine-Vehn, Juergen
Kornmann, Benoit
Liu, Caigang
Luo, Huan
Maduke, Merritt
Makin, Tamar
Marquand, Andre F.
Marston, Adele L.
Mistry, Pramod
Moses, Alan
Nelson, Sacha B.
Ng, Tony
Ojala, Paivi
Perry, George H.
Poirazi, Panayiota
Postovit, Lynne-Marie
机构：
来源：
ELIFE | 2024年 / 13卷
关键词：
scientific publishing; peer review; preprints; research assessment; research communication;
D O I：
10.7554/eLife.100571
中图分类号：
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
When deciding which submissions should be peer reviewed, eLife editors consider whether they will be able to find high-quality reviewers, and whether the reviews will be valuable to the scientific community.
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Peer review - Why, when and how
    Steer, Philip J.
    Ernst, Sabine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, 2021, 2
  • [2] (How) should researchers publicize their research papers before peer review?
    Peter Kardos
    Ádám Kun
    Csaba Pléh
    Ferenc Jordán
    Scientometrics, 2023, 128 : 2019 - 2023
  • [3] (How) should researchers publicize their research papers before peer review?
    Kardos, Peter
    Kun, Adam
    Pleh, Csaba
    Jordan, Ferenc
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (03) : 2019 - 2023
  • [4] Peer review without gatekeeping
    Eisen, Michael B.
    Akhmanova, Anna
    Behrens, Timothy E.
    Diedrichsen, Jorn
    Harper, Diane M.
    Iordanova, Mihaela D.
    Weigel, Detlef
    Zaidi, Mone
    ELIFE, 2022, 11
  • [5] PEER REVIEW OF CONFERENCE PAPERS: CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AUTHORS AND THE PAPERS
    Jose Mas-Ruiz, Francisco
    Ruiz-Conde, Enar
    Calderon-Martinez, Aurora
    Parreno-Selva, Josefa
    4TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED 2010), 2010, : 2344 - 2353
  • [6] JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments
    Oldham, Mark A.
    Kontos, Nicholas
    Baller, Erica
    Cerimele, Joseph M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF CONSULTATION-LIAISON PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 64 (05): : 468 - 472
  • [7] A Guide to the Peer Review of Scientific Papers
    Giunta, R. E.
    Prommersberger, K. -J.
    HANDCHIRURGIE MIKROCHIRURGIE PLASTISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2012, 44 (04) : 193 - 197
  • [8] Understanding peer review of software engineering papers
    Neil A. Ernst
    Jeffrey C. Carver
    Daniel Mendez
    Marco Torchiano
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2021, 26
  • [9] Understanding peer review of software engineering papers
    Ernst, Neil A.
    Carver, Jeffrey C.
    Mendez, Daniel
    Torchiano, Marco
    EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2021, 26 (05)
  • [10] Proposal for 'segmented peer review' of multidisciplinary papers
    Dinakaran, Deepak
    Anaka, Matthew
    Mackey, John R.
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 14 (02):
12345