Partisanship, Independence, and the Constitutive Representation of Women in the Canadian Senate

被引:2
作者
McCallion, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
women's representation; partisanship; parliament; Canada; content analysis; LEGISLATIVE POLICY-MAKING; SUBSTANTIVE REPRESENTATION; CRITICAL MASS; GENDER; INTERESTS; INSTITUTIONALISM; LEADERSHIP; BEHAVIOR; PARTIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1017/S1743923X24000084
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article investigates legislators' willingness to talk about gender and women during policy making discussions, asking whether it is conditional on their sex or partisanship in environments where party discipline does not constrain their speech. The Canadian Senate offers a case of a legislature with low or absent party discipline. A quantitative content analysis of nearly 1,000 Senate committee meetings confirms that sex is a primary indicator of legislators' inclination to talk about gender and women. Moreover, women senators who sit on committees with a critical mass of women members (30% or greater) are more likely to talk about gender and women, making the case for the importance of women's descriptive representation. Partisanship and independence had no significant effect on senators' propensity to discuss women. The findings suggest that partisanship does not constrain legislators' representation of women in environments with low party discipline.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Ajzenstat Janet., 2003, PROTECTING CANADIAN, P3
[2]   Opening the Attitudinal Black Box: Three Dimensions of Latin American Elites' Attitudes about Gender Equality [J].
Alexander, Amy ;
Bohigues, Asbel ;
Piscopo, Jennifer M. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2023, 76 (03) :1265-1280
[3]   Conceptions of political representation in Canada: An explanation of public opinion [J].
Anderson, CD ;
Goodyear-Grant, E .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE, 2005, 38 (04) :1029-1058
[4]   Detecting Diverse Perspectives: Using Text Analytics to Reveal Sex Differences in Congressional Debate About Defense [J].
Atkinson, Mary Layton ;
Mousavi, Reza ;
Windett, Jason H. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2023, 76 (01) :75-89
[5]   Sex isn't Gender: Reforming Concepts and Measurements in the Study of Public Opinion [J].
Bittner, Amanda ;
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 39 (04) :1019-1041
[6]   A Feminized Language of Democracy? The Representation of Women at Westminster since 1945 [J].
Blaxill, Luke ;
Beelen, Kaspar .
TWENTIETH CENTURY BRITISH HISTORY, 2016, 27 (03) :412-449
[7]   Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures [J].
Bratton, Kathleen A. .
POLITICS & GENDER, 2005, 1 (01) :97-125
[8]   A nonpartisan legislative chamber: The influence of the Canadian Senate [J].
Bridgman, Aengus .
PARTY POLITICS, 2021, 27 (05) :1009-1016
[9]  
Brown NadiaE., 2014, SISTERS STATEHOUSE B
[10]  
Butler Judith., 1992, GENDER TROUBLE FEMIN, DOI [10.4324/9780203828274, DOI 10.4324/9780203828274]