Meta-analytic validity of cognitive ability for hands-on military job proficiency

被引:3
作者
Cucina, Jeffrey M. [1 ]
Burtnick, Scott K. [1 ]
Musso, Maria E. De la Flor [2 ]
Walmsley, Philip T. [3 ]
Wilson, Kimberly J. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Customs & Border Protect, 90 K St,NE 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20229 USA
[2] E Business Consultants, McLean, VA 22101 USA
[3] US Off Personnel Management, 1900 E St NW, Washington, DC 20415 USA
关键词
Cognitive ability; Job performance; Hands-on performance tests; Criterion validity; Range restriction; INDIRECT RANGE RESTRICTION; GENERAL MENTAL-ABILITY; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; INTELLIGENCE; RELIABILITY; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.intell.2024.101818
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of U.S. military enlistment cognitive ability tests was conducted using hands-on performance tests (HOPTs) as the criterion. In a HOPT, incumbents perform a representative sample of the tasks for a position and are evaluated by trained raters. We found operational validities in the .40s to .50s. Our meta-analytic database allowed us to investigate concerns regarding overcorrections (via use of multivariate corrections with credible applicant covariances) and provides a direct measure of job proficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[71]  
Vineberg R., 1972, Technical Report No. 72-22
[72]   Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings [J].
Viswesvaran, C ;
Ones, DS ;
Schmidt, FL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (05) :557-574
[73]  
Wigdor A., 1991, Performance assessment for the workplace, V1
[74]  
Wise L. L., 1992, ERIC Document No. ED346165