Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy

被引:2
作者
De Silva, Kalani [1 ]
Brown, Amy [2 ]
Edwards, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Townsville Univ Hosp, POB 670, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Image -guidance radiation therapy; Transperineal ultrasound; Prostate intrafraction motion; PROBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. Methods: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography scans were retrospectively analysed. The probe to prostate apex distance (PPA), probe to inferior corpus spongiosum distance (PICS) and maximum perineum dose were calculated. Compression was represented by the PICS and the calculated corpus to prostate ratio (CPR). Demographics included treatment technique, image quality, body mass index (BMI) and age. Multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between compression measures and perineum dose. Results: The maximum dose to perineum ranged from 1.81 to 45.56 Gy, with a median of 5.87 Gy (Interquartile range (IQR) 3.17). The PICS distance and CPR recorded was 1.67 cm (IQR 0.63) and 0.51 (range 0.29-0.85) respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated both PICS and CPR were significant predictors of maximum dose to the perineum (p < 0.001). Patient-specific factors, including age, BMI, treatment technique and ultrasound image quality, were not factors that significantly impacted the maximum perineum dose. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant association between increased anatomical compression and perineal dose measurements. A PICS of 1.2 cm or greater is recommended, with compression reduced as much as possible without losing anatomical US definition. Future investigations would be beneficial to evaluate the optimal balance between ultrasound image quality and transducer compression considering the perineum dose.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING 3T AND PROSTATE CANCER: CORRELATION WITH TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY [J].
Castellucci, Roberto ;
Altieri, Vincenzo Maria ;
Marchioni, Michele ;
Castellan, Pietro ;
Pellegrini, Maurizio ;
Alvarez-Maestro, Mario ;
Sanchez-Gomez, Javier ;
De Francesco, Piergustavo ;
Ingrosso, Manuela ;
Tartaro, Armando ;
Tenaglia, Raffaele Lanfranca .
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2015, 68 (05) :493-501
[42]   Anatomical and dosimetric assessment of the prostate apex: A pilot comparison of image-guided transperineal ultrasound to conventional computed tomography simulation [J].
Shanker, Mihir D. ;
Kim, Anna N. H. ;
Brown, Amy ;
Tan, Alex H. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (06) :839-844
[43]   Comparison of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT [J].
Li, Minglun ;
Ballhausen, Hendrik ;
Hegemann, Nina-Sophie ;
Reiner, Michael ;
Tritschler, Stefan ;
Gratzke, Christian ;
Manapov, Farkhad ;
Corradini, Stefanie ;
Ganswindt, Ute ;
Belka, Claus .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 (03) :221-228
[44]   Radiation dose for prostate cancer: is more better? [J].
Vicini, F ;
Kestin, L ;
Ghilezan, M ;
Martinez, A .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2006, 3 (06) :298-299
[45]   Safety of accelerated hypofractionated whole pelvis radiation therapy prior to high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiation therapy prostate boost [J].
Phuong, Christina ;
Chan, Jason W. ;
Ni, Lisa ;
Wall, Phillip ;
Mohamad, Osama ;
Wong, Anthony C. ;
Hsu, I. -Chow ;
Chang, Albert J. .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
[46]   Safety of accelerated hypofractionated whole pelvis radiation therapy prior to high dose rate brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiation therapy prostate boost [J].
Christina Phuong ;
Jason W. Chan ;
Lisa Ni ;
Phillip Wall ;
Osama Mohamad ;
Anthony C. Wong ;
I.-Chow Hsu ;
Albert J. Chang .
Radiation Oncology, 17
[47]   Urethral dose and increment of international prostate symptom score (IPSS) in transperineal permanent interstitial implant (TPI) of prostate cancer [J].
Murakami, Naoya ;
Itami, Jun ;
Okuma, Kae ;
Marino, Hiroshi ;
Nakagawa, Keiichi ;
Ban, Tsukasa ;
Nakazato, Moritoshi ;
Kanai, Kazuyoshi ;
Naoi, Kuniji ;
Fuse, Masashi .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2008, 184 (10) :515-519
[48]   Radiation dose and late failures in prostate cancer [J].
Morgan, Peter B. ;
Hanlon, Alexandra L. ;
Horwitz, Eric M. ;
Buyyounouski, Mark K. ;
Uzzo, Robert G. ;
Pollack, Alan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (04) :1074-1081
[49]   Rectal Radiation Dose and Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With and Without Hydrogel [J].
Kundu, Palak ;
Lin, Eric Y. ;
Yoon, Stephanie M. ;
Parikh, Neil R. ;
Ruan, Dan ;
Kishan, Amar U. ;
Lee, Alan ;
Steinberg, Michael L. ;
Chang, Albert J. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[50]   HIF1A expression in localized prostate cancer treated with dose escalation radiation therapy [J].
Zapatero, Almudena ;
Morente, Manuel ;
Martin de Vidales, Carmen ;
Adrados, Magdalena ;
Lopez, Consuelo ;
Nieto, Santiago ;
Artiga Gonzalez, Maria Jesus ;
Arellano, Ramon ;
Cruz Conde, Alfonso ;
Garcia Vicente, Feliciano .
CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2015, 15 (01) :41-46