Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy

被引:2
作者
De Silva, Kalani [1 ]
Brown, Amy [2 ]
Edwards, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Townsville Univ Hosp, POB 670, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
来源
TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 23卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Image -guidance radiation therapy; Transperineal ultrasound; Prostate intrafraction motion; PROBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. Methods: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography scans were retrospectively analysed. The probe to prostate apex distance (PPA), probe to inferior corpus spongiosum distance (PICS) and maximum perineum dose were calculated. Compression was represented by the PICS and the calculated corpus to prostate ratio (CPR). Demographics included treatment technique, image quality, body mass index (BMI) and age. Multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between compression measures and perineum dose. Results: The maximum dose to perineum ranged from 1.81 to 45.56 Gy, with a median of 5.87 Gy (Interquartile range (IQR) 3.17). The PICS distance and CPR recorded was 1.67 cm (IQR 0.63) and 0.51 (range 0.29-0.85) respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated both PICS and CPR were significant predictors of maximum dose to the perineum (p < 0.001). Patient-specific factors, including age, BMI, treatment technique and ultrasound image quality, were not factors that significantly impacted the maximum perineum dose. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant association between increased anatomical compression and perineal dose measurements. A PICS of 1.2 cm or greater is recommended, with compression reduced as much as possible without losing anatomical US definition. Future investigations would be beneficial to evaluate the optimal balance between ultrasound image quality and transducer compression considering the perineum dose.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Impact on rectal dose from the use of a prostate immobilization and rectal localization device for patients receiving dose escalated 3D conformal radiation therapy [J].
Sanghani, MV ;
Ching, J ;
Schultz, D ;
Cormack, R ;
Loffredo, M ;
McMahon, E ;
Beard, C ;
D'Amico, AV .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2004, 22 (03) :165-168
[32]   Prefraction displacement and intrafraction drift of the prostate due to perineal ultrasound probe pressure [J].
Li, Minglun ;
Hegemann, Nina-Sophie ;
Manapov, Farkhad ;
Kolberg, Anne ;
Thum, Patrick Dominik ;
Ganswindt, Ute ;
Belka, Claus ;
Ballhausen, Hendrik .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 (06) :459-465
[33]   Studying the efficacy of escalated dose conformal radiation therapy in prostate carcinoma - Pakistan experience [J].
Zamir, Asad ;
Farooq, Ahmad ;
Nisar, Hasan ;
Fatima, Ismat ;
Khan, Irfan Ullah ;
Masood, Misbah ;
Shahid, Abubaker .
JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 80 (11) :705-711
[34]   High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer [J].
Deger, S ;
Boehmer, D ;
Roigas, J ;
Schink, T ;
Wernecke, KD ;
Wiegel, T ;
Hinkelbein, W ;
Budach, V ;
Loening, SA .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (04) :441-448
[35]   Transrectal vs. transperineal fusion biopsy of the prostate. Time to switch to the perineal technique-comparison of methods and description of the transperineal procedure under local anesthesia [J].
Pfitzinger, Paulo Leonardo ;
Enzinger, Benazir ;
Ebner, Benedikt ;
Ivanova, Troya ;
Volz, Yannic ;
Chaloupka, Michael ;
Apfelbeck, Maria ;
Stief, Christian .
UROLOGIE, 2023, 62 (05) :473-478
[36]   Postprostatectomy salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Impact of pathological and biochemical variables and prostate fossa biopsy [J].
Mosbacher, MR ;
Schiff, PB ;
O'Toole, KM ;
Benson, MC ;
Olsson, CA ;
Brody, RA ;
Ennis, RD .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (03) :242-246
[37]   The impact of geometric uncertainty on hypofractionated external beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer [J].
Craig, T ;
Moiseenko, V ;
Battista, J ;
Van Dyk, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (03) :833-842
[38]   The impact of radiation therapy on the TCR Vβ chain repertoire in patients with prostate cancer [J].
Goulielmaki, Maria ;
Davanos, Nikolaos ;
Kogionou, Paraskevi ;
Batsaki, Panagiota ;
Stokidis, Savvas ;
Adamaki, Maria ;
Mosa, Eftychia ;
Vasilakou, Evanthia ;
Zambatis, Charalambos ;
Gritzapis, Angelos D. ;
Zoumpourlis, Vassilios ;
Baxevanis, Constantin N. ;
Fortis, Sotirios P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 60 (06)
[39]   A system for MRI-guided transperineal delivery of needles to the prostate for focal therapy [J].
Cepek, Jeremy ;
Chronik, Blaine A. ;
Lindner, Uri ;
Trachtenberg, John ;
Davidson, Sean R. H. ;
Bax, Jeffrey ;
Fenster, Aaron .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (01)
[40]   MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING 3T AND PROSTATE CANCER: CORRELATION WITH TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY [J].
Castellucci, Roberto ;
Altieri, Vincenzo Maria ;
Marchioni, Michele ;
Castellan, Pietro ;
Pellegrini, Maurizio ;
Alvarez-Maestro, Mario ;
Sanchez-Gomez, Javier ;
De Francesco, Piergustavo ;
Ingrosso, Manuela ;
Tartaro, Armando ;
Tenaglia, Raffaele Lanfranca .
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2015, 68 (05) :493-501