Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy

被引:1
作者
De Silva, Kalani [1 ]
Brown, Amy [2 ]
Edwards, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Gardens Point Campus, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Townsville Univ Hosp, POB 670, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
来源
TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 23卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Image -guidance radiation therapy; Transperineal ultrasound; Prostate intrafraction motion; PROBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. Methods: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography scans were retrospectively analysed. The probe to prostate apex distance (PPA), probe to inferior corpus spongiosum distance (PICS) and maximum perineum dose were calculated. Compression was represented by the PICS and the calculated corpus to prostate ratio (CPR). Demographics included treatment technique, image quality, body mass index (BMI) and age. Multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between compression measures and perineum dose. Results: The maximum dose to perineum ranged from 1.81 to 45.56 Gy, with a median of 5.87 Gy (Interquartile range (IQR) 3.17). The PICS distance and CPR recorded was 1.67 cm (IQR 0.63) and 0.51 (range 0.29-0.85) respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated both PICS and CPR were significant predictors of maximum dose to the perineum (p < 0.001). Patient-specific factors, including age, BMI, treatment technique and ultrasound image quality, were not factors that significantly impacted the maximum perineum dose. Conclusion: There was a statistically significant association between increased anatomical compression and perineal dose measurements. A PICS of 1.2 cm or greater is recommended, with compression reduced as much as possible without losing anatomical US definition. Future investigations would be beneficial to evaluate the optimal balance between ultrasound image quality and transducer compression considering the perineum dose.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Liauw, Stanley L.
    Fricano, Janine
    Correa, David
    Weichselbaum, Ralph R.
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (08) : 1784 - 1790
  • [22] Erectile Dysfunction and Penile Bulb Dose Following Definitive Prostate Radiation Therapy
    Nouri, Masoumeh
    Khandani, Maryam Kalantari
    Javadinia, Seyed Alireza
    Pashaki, Abdolazim Sedighi
    Alemi, Mohsen
    Tapak, Leili
    Mojtahedi, Hamidreza
    Amlashi, Zahra Keshtpour
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [23] Impact of radiation dose on recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients
    Deek, Matthew
    Lilleby, Wolfgang
    Vaage, Victoria
    Hole, Knut H.
    DeWeese, Theodore
    Stensvold, Andreas
    Phuoc Tran
    Seierstad, Therese
    PROSTATE, 2020, 80 (15) : 1322 - 1327
  • [24] Prostate Focused Ultrasound Therapy
    Chapelon, Jean-Yves
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Gelet, Albert
    THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND, 2016, 880 : 21 - 41
  • [25] A novel perineal shield for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy
    Weiner, Joseph P.
    Schwartz, David
    Safdieh, Joseph
    Polubarov, Alex
    Telly, Tejas
    Worth, Matthew
    Schreiber, David
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2015, 7 (03) : 197 - 202
  • [26] Feasibility and radiation induced toxicity regarding the first application of transperineal implementation of biocompatible balloon for high dose radiotherapy in patients with prostate carcinoma
    Kouloulias, Vassilis
    Kalogeropoulos, Theodoros
    Platoni, Kalliopi
    Georgakopoulos, John
    Matsopoulos, George
    Chaldeopoulos, Dimitris
    Beli, Ivelina
    Pantelakos, Panagiotis
    Asimakopoulos, Charalambos
    Kouvaris, John
    Kelekis, Nikolaos
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [27] Dosimetric impact of rectum and bladder anatomy and intrafractional prostate motion on hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy
    M. Roch
    A. Zapatero
    P. Castro
    D. Hernández
    M. Chevalier
    F. García-Vicente
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2021, 23 : 2293 - 2301
  • [28] Dosimetric impact of rectum and bladder anatomy and intrafractional prostate motion on hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy
    Roch, M.
    Zapatero, A.
    Castro, P.
    Hernandez, D.
    Chevalier, M.
    Garcia-Vicente, F.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (11) : 2293 - 2301
  • [29] Feasibility and radiation induced toxicity regarding the first application of transperineal implementation of biocompatible balloon for high dose radiotherapy in patients with prostate carcinoma
    Vassilis Kouloulias
    Theodoros Kalogeropoulos
    Kalliopi Platoni
    John Georgakopoulos
    George Matsopoulos
    Dimitris Chaldeopoulos
    Ivelina Beli
    Panagiotis Pantelakos
    Charalambos Asimakopoulos
    John Kouvaris
    Nikolaos Kelekis
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [30] The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy
    Ficarra, V
    Novella, G
    Novara, G
    Galfano, A
    Pea, M
    Martignoni, G
    Artibani, W
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (06) : 932 - 937