Kinetic Modeling and Techno-Economic Analysis of a Methanol-to-Gasoline Production Repurposed Refinery Equipment

被引:3
|
作者
Gallego, Carolina Arias [1 ]
Khandavilli, Muralikrishna [1 ]
Kobayashi, Leiliang [1 ]
Sarathy, S. Mani [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Clean Combust Res Ctr, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia
来源
ACS OMEGA | 2024年 / 9卷 / 21期
关键词
CATALYTIC DEHYDRATION; DIMETHYL ETHER; FUELS; CONVERSION; OLEFINS; TRENDS; GAS;
D O I
10.1021/acsomega.4c01327
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Methanol-to-gasoline (MtG) is an alternative process for the production of liquid fuel that involves the conversion of methanol into light and heavy hydrocarbons. The attractiveness of this option relies on multiple feedstocks that can be used to produce methanol, which can impact the greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere in comparison to petroleum-based feedstocks. However, one of the challenges of this alternative gasoline production is its high investment cost. This study presents a solution to increase affordability by using repurposed equipment from petrochemical industries. The study employs three modeling techniques, i.e., kinetic modeling, process modeling, and techno-economic analysis. First, a lumped MtG kinetic mechanism using an hierarchical zeolite socony mobil-5 (HZSM-5) catalyst was developed and validated against the literature data to enable high-accuracy process modeling and optimization. Then, the kinetics were implemented in Aspen Plus V12 for process simulations of the fixed-bed MtG, optimization of the operating conditions, and heat integration to increase energy efficiency. Lastly, a techno-economic analysis (TEA) gives the levelized cost of the e-gasoline along with the sensitivity analysis to demonstrate the variables that mainly affect the cost. The TEA showed a price for the e-gasoline with a gray methanol feedstock of 1.82 USD/L, which is comparable with the current average retail gasoline price (1.29 USD/L). Additionally, increasing the capacity by 161 times can reduce the levelized price of e-gasoline to 0.761 USD/L.
引用
收藏
页码:22858 / 22870
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] A chemical kinetic analysis of knock propensity of methanol-to-gasoline fuel
    Macdonald, James
    Lopez-Pintor, Dario
    Matsubara, Naoyoshi
    Kitano, Koji
    Yamada, Ryota
    FUEL, 2025, 382
  • [3] Analysis of kinetic models of the methanol-to-gasoline (MTG) process in an integral reactor
    Gayubo, AG
    Benito, PL
    Aguayo, AT
    Aguirre, I
    Bilbao, J
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 1996, 63 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [4] Techno-Economic Analysis of the Optimum Softwood Lignin Content for the Production of Bioethanol in a Repurposed Kraft Mill
    Wu, Shufang
    Jameel, Hasan
    Chang, Hou-min
    Phillips, Richard
    BIORESOURCES, 2014, 9 (04): : 6817 - 6830
  • [6] TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE OPTIMUM SOFTWOOD LIGNIN CONTENT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF BIOETHANOL IN A REPURPOSED KRAFT MILL
    Wu, Shufang
    Jameel, Hasan
    Chang, Hou-min
    Phillips, Richard
    Park, Sunkyu
    PROCEEDING OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PULPING, PAPERMAKING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY (ICPPB '12), VOLS. I AND II, 2012, : 1034 - 1039
  • [7] Techno-economic analysis of renewable aviation fuel production: From farming to refinery processes
    Tongpun, Pimpun
    Wang, Wei-Cheng
    Srinophakun, Penjit
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 226 : 6 - 17
  • [8] An extended techno-economic analysis of the utilization of glycerol as an alternative feedstock for methanol production
    Raphael G. D. França
    Priscila A. Souza
    Eduardo R. A. Lima
    André L. H. Costa
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2017, 19 : 1855 - 1865
  • [9] An extended techno-economic analysis of the utilization of glycerol as an alternative feedstock for methanol production
    Franca, Raphael G. D.
    Souza, Priscila A.
    Lima, Eduardo R. A.
    Costa, Andre L. H.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2017, 19 (07) : 1855 - 1865
  • [10] Techno-Economic Analysis of Methanol to Olefins Separation Processes
    Park, Jonghyun
    Jeong, Youngmin
    Han, Myungwan
    KOREAN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (01): : 69 - 83