Effects of Elective Revision after Breast Reconstruction on Patient-Reported Outcomes

被引:1
作者
Zong, Amanda M. [1 ]
Leibl, Kayla E. [1 ]
Weichman, Katie E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Bronx, NY USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, Hansjorg Wyss Dept Plast Surg, 305 33rd St,Lower Level, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; revision; patient-reported outcomes; SURGERY; MASTECTOMY; SATISFACTION; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1055/a-2332-0359
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There has been increasing emphasis on patient-reported satisfaction as a measure of surgical outcomes. While previous research has investigated factors influencing patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction, there are few studies on how patient satisfaction is impacted by revision procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether elective revisions following breast reconstruction are significantly associated with changes in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent immediate autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction at a single institution from 2015 to 2021. Patients were included if they had completed BREAST-Q preoperatively, post-initial reconstruction, and post-revision procedures. Patients were excluded if they received adjuvant radiation or if they had previously undergone breast reconstruction procedures. The primary outcome measures were BREAST-Q domains. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were also analyzed. Results Of the 123 patients included for analysis, 61 underwent autologous breast reconstruction and 62 underwent alloplastic reconstruction. Mean age was 49.31 +/- 11.58 years and body mass index (BMI) was 29.55 +/- 5.63 kg/m(2). Forty-eight patients underwent no revision procedures and 75 patients underwent at least one revision. Between these two groups, there were no differences in age, BMI, complication rates, socioeconomic status, or preoperative BREAST-Q scores. Patients reported significantly higher satisfaction with outcome after their first revision compared with after initial reconstruction alone (p = 0.04). Autologous reconstruction patients who had at least one revision had significantly higher satisfaction with outcome (p = 0.02) and satisfaction with surgeon (p = 0.05) in the 2-year follow-up period compared with patients who had no revisions. Conclusion Revision procedures following autologous breast reconstruction are associated with higher patient satisfaction with outcome. Further research should explore specific factors influencing patient decision-making regarding whether to undergo revisions.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 112
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A Paradigm Shift in US Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates [J].
Albornoz, Claudia R. ;
Bach, Peter B. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Disa, Joseph J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
McCarthy, Colleen M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Matros, Evan .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 131 (01) :15-23
[2]   Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction [J].
Andrade, WN ;
Baxter, N ;
Semple, JL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (01) :46-54
[3]   Revision in autologous breast reconstruction: Principles and approach [J].
Beahm, Elisabeth K. ;
Walton, Robert L. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 34 (01) :139-+
[4]   Long-term outcomes of breast reconstruction and the need for revision surgery [J].
Ben Finlay ;
Kollias, Victoria ;
Hall, Kelly A. ;
Clement, Zackariah ;
Bingham, Janne ;
Whitfield, Robert ;
Kollias, James ;
Bochner, Melissa .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 91 (09) :1751-1758
[5]   The Costs of Breast Reconstruction and Implications for Episode-Based Bundled Payment Models [J].
Berlin, Nicholas L. ;
Chung, Kevin C. ;
Matros, Evan ;
Chen, Jung-Sheng ;
Momoh, Adeyiza O. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (06) :721E-730E
[6]   A Comparative Analysis of Immediate and Delayed-immediate Breast Reconstruction after Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy [J].
Christopher, Adrienne N. ;
Morris, Martin P. ;
Broach, Robyn B. ;
Serletti, Joseph M. .
JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2022, 38 (06) :499-505
[7]   Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up? [J].
Clarke-Pearson, Emily M. ;
Lin, Alex M. ;
Hertl, Catherine ;
Austen, William G. ;
Colwell, Amy S. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 137 (06) :1690-1699
[8]   Revision Surgery to Improve Cosmesis with Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction [J].
Clough, R. ;
Darragh, L. ;
Maclennan, L. ;
O'Donoghue, J. M. .
JPRAS OPEN, 2021, 29 :106-112
[9]   The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015 [J].
Cohen, Wess A. ;
Mundy, Lily R. ;
Ballard, Tiffany N. S. ;
Klassen, Anne ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Browne, John ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (02) :149-162
[10]   Radiation Therapy Versus No Radiation Therapy to the Neo-breast Following Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Autologous Free Flap Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: Patient-Reported and Surgical Outcomes at 1 Yeard-A Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium (MROC) Substudy [J].
Cooke, Andrew L. ;
Diaz-Abele, Julian ;
Hayakawa, Tom ;
Buchel, Ed ;
Dalke, Kimberly ;
Lambert, Pascal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (01) :165-172