Are biocultural rights the foundations of a responsible relationship between humans and Nature?

The paper asserts that the concept of biocultural rights aligns with a profound and enduring trend advocating for the localization or adaptation of legal concepts, a movement significantly influenced by various social sciences, notably anthropology. This trend is based on a strong critique of expertocracy in favor of grass -roots approaches; alongside the recognition of indigenous knowledge and biocultural diversity. Moreover, it emphasizes collective ownership predicated on usage rather than mere possession, coupled with a vigorous condemnation of commodification. Understanding the full scope of biocultural rights necessitates acknowledging the intricate relationship between their ethical and legal dimensions. Nonetheless, the challenge lies in the widespread appeal of the concept of stewardship as the ethical responsibilities associated with << stewardship >> are the counterpart of the legal framework of rights. Ultimately, the endeavor aims to restore a link between law and morality, striving to establish an ethical foundation for legal frameworks, albeit grappling with the challenge of defining an objective ethics.