A trust relationship network-based consensus model in large-scale TODIM group decision-making

被引:2
作者
Chu, Junfeng [1 ]
Shu, Pan [2 ]
Liu, Yicong [2 ]
Wang, Yanyan [3 ]
Wang, Yingming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Decis Sci Inst, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yishan Campus, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Publ Management, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Trust relationship; Large-scale group; TODIM; Sub-clusters; Deviation degree; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; PROSPECT-THEORY; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1108/K-11-2023-2442
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
PurposeIn large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) situations, existing TODIM group decision-making methods often fail to account for the influence of social network relationships and the bounded rationality of decision-makers (DMs). To address this issue, a new TODIM-based group decision-making method is proposed that considers the current trust relationships among DMs in a large-scale trust relationship network.Design/methodology/approachThis method consists of two main stages. In the first stage, the large-scale group is partitioned into several sub-clusters based on trust relationships among DMs. The dominance degree matrix of each sub-cluster is then aggregated into the large-scale group dominance degree. In the second stage, after aggregating the large-scale group dominance degree, the consensus index is calculated to identify any inconsistent sub-clusters. Feedback adjustments are made based on trust relationships until a consensus is reached. The TODIM method is then applied to calculate the corresponding ranking results. Finally, an illustrative example is applied to show the feasibility of the proposed model.FindingsThe proposed method is practical and effective which is verified by the real case study. By taking into account the trust relationships among DMs in the core process of LSGDM, it indeed has an impact on the decision outcomes. We also specifically address this issue in Chapter Five. The proposed method fully incorporates the bounded rationality of DMs, namely their tendency to accept the opinions of trusted experts, which aligns more with their psychology. The two-stage consensus model proposed in this paper effectively addresses the limitations of traditional assessment-based methods.Originality/valueThis study establishes a two-stage consensus model based on trust relationships among DMs, which can assist DMs in better understanding trust issues in complex decision-making, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of decisions, and providing more scientific decision support for organizations such as businesses and governments.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Perez, I. J. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) :149-157
[2]   Large-Scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an Artificial Intelligence and applications perspective [J].
Ding, Ru-Xi ;
Palomares, Ivan ;
Wang, Xueqing ;
Yang, Guo-Rui ;
Liu, Bingsheng ;
Dong, Yucheng ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 59 :84-102
[3]   Consensus Reaching and Strategic Manipulation in Group Decision Making With Trust Relationships [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Zha, Quanbo ;
Zhang, Hengjie ;
Herrera, Francisco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (10) :6304-6318
[4]  
Gomes L. F. A. M., 1992, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, V17, P171
[5]  
Gomes L. F. A. M., 1991, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, V16, P113
[6]   Fuzzy clustering with squared Minkowski distances [J].
Groenen, PJF ;
Jajuga, K .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 120 (02) :227-237
[7]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[8]   Combining prospect theory and fuzzy numbers to multi-criteria decision making [J].
Krohling, Renato A. ;
de Souza, Talles T. M. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (13) :11487-11493
[9]   A two-stage dynamic influence model-achieving decision-making consensus within large scale groups operating with incomplete information [J].
Li, Shengli ;
Wei, Cuiping .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2020, 189
[10]   Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network [J].
Li, Yanhong ;
Kou, Gang ;
Li, Guangxu ;
Peng, Yi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 303 (02) :790-802