Giving Credit Where Credit is Due: An Artificial Intelligence Contribution Statement for Research Methods Writing Assignments

被引:3
作者
Albada, Nicole Alea [1 ]
Woods, Vanessa E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
generative artificial intelligence tools; citation practices; instructor resource; writing; research methods;
D O I
10.1177/00986283241259750
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Citation practices are fundamental to teaching scholarly writing. With the emergence of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, students need a structured way to cite when and how these technologies are used.Objective This paper introduces an instructor resource, an AI Contribution Statement, which provides students with an ethical and explicit framework for reporting on AI use during idea generation and writing in research methods.Method Students were guided to create an AI Contribution Statement that reports when an AI technology was used for a research paper, what prompts were given and text generated, and how the information was incorporated into a final written product.Results Sixty-four percent of students reported using AI assistive technologies. Of those, 33.12% reported using it more than twice, suggesting that, when allowed in a course, students' use is relatively low.Conclusion Training students in best citation practices regarding ethical and transparent use of AI technologies is important, yet additional research is needed to understand how students are using it and how instructors can leverage this tool to foster equity.Teaching Implications An AI Contribution Statement is an important addition to research methods teaching to create equality in technology use and student success.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 284
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 2023, APA GUIDELINES UNDER
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, ChatGPT [Large language model]
[3]  
2023, Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, V6, DOI [10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.12, DOI 10.37074/JALT.2023.6.2.12, 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.12]
[4]   Students' voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education [J].
Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk ;
Hu, Wenjie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 20 (01)
[5]  
Chenneville T., 2021, SCHOLARSHIP TEACHING, P1
[6]  
Explainpaper computer software, 2024, US
[7]  
Nah FFH, 2023, Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, V25, P277, DOI [10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814, 10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814, DOI 10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814]
[8]   Drivers and Consequences of ChatGPT Use in Higher Education: Key Stakeholder Perspectives [J].
Hasanein, Ahmed M. ;
Sobaih, Abu Elnasr E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2023, 13 (11) :2599-2614
[9]   Using AI to write scholarly publications [J].
Hosseini, Mohammad ;
Rasmussen, Lisa M. M. ;
Resnik, David B. B. .
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (07) :715-723
[10]  
Kortenkamp K. V., 2023, SCHOLARSHIP TEACHING, P1