Modern slavery disclosure regulations in the global supply Chain: A world-systems perspective

被引:4
作者
Ahmad, Nglaa [1 ]
Haque, Shamima [2 ]
Islam, Muhammad Azizul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Univ Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
Modern Slavery Disclosure Regulations; World -Systems Theory; Core countries; Periphery countries; HUMAN TRAFFICKING; HUMAN-RIGHTS; TRANSPARENCY; GLOBALIZATION; MARKET; RESPONSIBILITY; STANDARDS; PROGRAMS; SOCIETY; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102677
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study provides a linguistic analysis of three modern slavery disclosure regulations, the California Transparency in the Supply Chain Act (CTSCA) 2010, section 54 of the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and the Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018. These regulations require companies to report their actions to tackle labour exploitation within global supply chains. Based on World-System Theory (WST: Wallerstein, 1975, 1979, 2015) and by relying on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), we examined the disclosure regulations and found that the texts of and discourses around the regulations are not neutral and allow social wrongs to continue in global supply chains. Although regulators claim modern slavery disclosure regulations to be a step in the right direction, our investigation reveals a different picture: the linguistic features of the regulations support the perpetuating risk of modern slavery in global supply chains based in the periphery countries. We argue that changing the current global power structure/system is necessary to address the grand challenges of regulating modern slavery. There is a need for disclosure regime that can protect vulnerable communities, including workers in the global supply chains.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 164 条
[91]  
Landau Ingrid, 2018, FEDERAL LAW REV, V46, P313, DOI DOI 10.1177/0067205X1804600206
[92]  
Larrinaga C., 2002, European Accounting Review, V11, P723, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0963818022000001000, 10.1080/0963818022000001000]
[93]  
LBL (Labour behind the Label), 2020, How are brands protecting supply chain workers during COVID-19?
[94]   The domestic politics of corporate accountability legislation: struggles over the 2015 UK Modern Slavery Act [J].
LeBaron, Genevieve ;
Ruhmkorf, Andreas .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 17 (03) :709-743
[95]   Globalization and Commitment in Corporate Social Responsibility: Cross-National Analyses of Institutional and Political-Economy Effects [J].
Lim, Alwyn ;
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 77 (01) :69-98
[96]   Critical Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics: A Methodological Review [J].
Lin, Angel .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2014, 34 :213-232
[97]  
Lunn R., 2018, Shall, must or something else for obligation in legislation and legislation-type documents?
[98]   Intertextuality in corporate narratives: a discursive analysis of a contested privatization [J].
Lupu, Ioana ;
Sandu, Raluca .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2017, 30 (03) :534-564
[99]  
Machin D., 2012, DO CRITICAL DISCOURS
[100]  
Marger M., 1987, ELITES MASSES INTRO