Research Ethics and International and Cross-Cultural Research: Fiji and Aotearoa New Zealand

被引:1
作者
Cossham, Amanda [1 ,3 ]
Bidwell, Pam [1 ]
Pai, Lorin [2 ]
机构
[1] Open Polytech, Learning Delivery, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
[2] Univ South Pacific, Univ Lib, Suva, Fiji
[3] POB 31914, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand
关键词
Research ethics; ethical review; cross-cultural research; collaborative research; research ethics committees; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1080/24750158.2024.2359153
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
There are significant challenges associated with conducting research with a researcher from another institution, in another country or with another culture, and even more challenges when all three factors apply. This paper critically appraises the complexities of a cross-cultural, international and collaborative research project, and identifies the challenges for the researchers and their organisations, and the ways in which these were managed. It evaluates the process of obtaining ethics approval from two organisations in Aotearoa New Zealand and Fiji. This paper presents the perspectives of both the researchers and the organisations providing ethics approval. There is often concern that research conducted by someone from a 'global north' country (here, Aotearoa New Zealand) in a 'global south' country (here, Fiji) will have power asymmetries, and that research will disadvantage the researched community, or not provide any benefit back to them; this project directly addressed these concerns. The research outputs, and research outcomes and impact, need to be considered at the research design stage to ensure they are appropriate for the community in which the research is being conducted. While organisations may be reluctant to approve research conducted in a different culture and country, the risks can be managed and mitigated.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 265
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Pacific Research Protocols
[2]   Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries [J].
Benatar, SR .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 54 (07) :1131-1141
[3]  
Boamah E., 2014, EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT
[4]   Navigating cross-cultural research: methodological and ethical considerations [J].
Broesch, Tanya ;
Crittenden, Alyssa N. ;
Beheim, Bret A. ;
Blackwell, Aaron D. ;
Bunce, John A. ;
Colleran, Heidi ;
Hagel, Kristin ;
Kline, Michelle ;
McElreath, Richard ;
Nelson, Robin G. ;
Pisor, Anne C. ;
Prall, Sean ;
Pretelli, Ilaria ;
Purzycki, Benjamin ;
Quinn, Elizabeth A. ;
Ross, Cody ;
Scelza, Brooke ;
Starkweather, Kathrine ;
Stieglitz, Jonathan ;
Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 287 (1935)
[5]  
BUIL Isabel., 2012, J TARGETING MEASUREM, V20, P223, DOI DOI 10.1057/JT.2012.18
[6]   The ethics review and the humanities and social sciences: disciplinary distinctions in ethics review processes [J].
Carniel, Jessica ;
Hickey, Andrew ;
Southey, Kim ;
Bromdal, Annette ;
Crowley-Cyr, Lynda ;
Eacersall, Douglas ;
Farmer, Will ;
Gehrmann, Richard ;
Machin, Tanya ;
Pillay, Yosheen .
RESEARCH ETHICS, 2023, 19 (02) :139-156
[7]  
Conciliation Resources, FIJI CONFLICT FOCUS
[8]   The Importance of Ethical Appraisal in Social Science Research: Reviewing a Faculty of Humanities' Research Ethics Committee [J].
de Wet K. .
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2010, 8 (4) :301-314
[9]  
Denzin N. K., 2005, The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[10]  
Denzin Norman., 2008, Handbook of Critical Indigenous Methodology