共 97 条
Predicting the mechanical properties of plastic concrete: An optimization method by using genetic programming and ensemble learners
被引:46
作者:
Asif, Usama
[1
]
Javed, Muhammad Faisal
[2
]
Abuhussain, Maher
[5
]
Ali, Mujahid
[4
]
Khan, Waseem Akhtar
[3
]
Mohamed, Abdullah
[6
]
机构:
[1] Nazarbayev Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Astana, Kazakhstan
[2] Ghulam Ishaq Khan Inst Engn Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Topi, Pakistan
[3] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Dept Civil Engn, Lafayette, LA 70503 USA
[4] Silesian Tech Univ, Fac Transport & Aviat Engn, Dept Transport Syst Traff Engn & Logist, Krasinskiego 8 St, PL-40019 Katowice, Poland
[5] Umm Al Qura Univ, Coll Engn & Comp Al Qunfudah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Mecca, Saudi Arabia
[6] Future Univ Egypt, Res Ctr, New Cairo 11835, Egypt
关键词:
Plastic concrete;
Machine learning;
Compressive strength;
Flexural strength;
Sustainability;
Ensemble learning algorithms;
Gene expression programming;
HIGH-PERFORMANCE CONCRETE;
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH;
SPLITTING TENSILE;
WASTE;
FORMULATIONS;
MODELS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03135
中图分类号:
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号:
0813 ;
摘要:
This study presents a comparative analysis of individual and ensemble learning algorithms (ELAs) to predict the compressive strength (CS) and flexural strength (FS) of plastic concrete. Multilayer perceptron neuron network (MLPNN), Support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) were used as base learners, which were then combined with bagging and Adaboost methods to improve the predictive performance. In addition, gene expression programming (GEP) was used to develop computational equations that can be used to predict the CS and FS of plastic concrete. An extensive database containing 357 and 125 data points was obtained from the literature, and the eight most impactful ingredients were used in the model's development. The accuracy of all models was assessed using several statistical measures, including an error matrix, Akaike information criterion (AIC), K-fold cross-validation, and other external validation equations. Furthermore, sensitivity and SHAP analysis were performed to evaluate input variables' relative significance and impact on the anticipated CS and FS. Based on statistical measures and other validation criteria, GEP outpaces all other individual models, whereas, in ELAs, the SVR ensemble with Adaboost and RF modified with the Bagging technique demonstrated superior performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and sensitivity analysis reveal that plastic, cement, water, and the age of the specimens have the highest influence, while superplasticizer has the lowest impact, which is consistent with experimental studies. Moreover, GUI and GEP-based simple mathematical correlation can enhance the practical scope of this study and be an effective tool for the pre-mix design of plastic concrete.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文