2.5D finite element algorithm based on Drucker-Prager yield criterion

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Luao [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Guangyun [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Shandong Prov Key Lab Civil Engn Disaster Prevent, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Drucker-Prager yield criterion; Elastic-plastic; 2.5-D FEM; Tangent stiffness method;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108676
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This note regards the embankment as an ideal elastic -plastic material, and introduces the Drucker -Prager yield criterion into 2.5-D FEM. Firstly, the pure elastic trial stress is applied, and the Drucker -Prager yield criterion is used to determine whether yielding will occur or not. Then, the backward Euler integration method and the tangent stiffness method are used to derive the consistent tangent modulus matrix, after which the iterative correction of plastic deformation is realized. Finally, an elastoplastic 2.5D FEM is proposed according to the procedures. Compared with the measured values and existing results, it was found that the elastic -plastic 2.5-D finite element algorithm proposed in this note has good consistency with the measured values. Due to the consideration of the plastic deformation of the foundation soil induced by train moving loads, the present results are slightly larger than those of existing elastic methods.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Subloading surface model for rock based on modified Drucker-Prager criterion
    Zhou Y.-Q.
    Sheng Q.
    Zhu Z.-Q.
    Fu X.-D.
    1600, Academia Sinica (38): : 400 - 408and418
  • [23] Finite Element Implementation of the Exponential Drucker-Prager Plasticity Model for Adhesive Joints
    Suwanpakpraek, Kerati
    Patamaprohm, Baramee
    Pornpeerakeat, Sacharuck
    Chaikittiratana, Arisara
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2023, 135 (03): : 1765 - 1778
  • [24] Cause of Errors Associated with Application of Drucker-Prager Yield Criterion in MSC/NASTRAN Program
    WANG Jin jun University of New South Wales
    Journal of Shanghai University, 2000, (01) : 11 - 13
  • [25] Analysis on shear strength parameters based on Drucker-Prager yield criteria
    Li, Lei
    Zhang, Meng-Xi
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2013, 47 (09): : 1404 - 1408
  • [26] Study of elastoplastic damage constitutive model of rocks based on Drucker-Prager criterion
    College of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Rock Soil Mech, 4 (1103-1108):
  • [27] Coefficient of equivalent plastic strain based on the associated flow of the Drucker-Prager criterion
    Ding, Xiang
    Zhang, Guangqing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2017, 93 : 15 - 20
  • [28] Estimation of Yield Surface on Iron Powder Compaction for Finite Element Analysis using Drucker-Prager Cap Model
    Ogawa, R.
    Yoshimura, T.
    Yagi, N.
    Mizuta, K.
    Taniguchi, Y.
    9TH THAI SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (TSME-ICOME 2018), 2019, 501
  • [29] Integration algorithms based on drucker-prager criterion and application in slope stability analysis
    Pan, Yuanwei
    Liu, Yaoru
    Qian, Jingjuan
    Yang, Qiang
    Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 2013, : 757 - 763
  • [30] Accelerating fracture simulation with phase field methods based on Drucker-Prager criterion
    Liu, Bin
    Liu, Zhenghe
    Yang, Lusheng
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2023, 11