Reducing transaction costs using intraday forecasts of limit order book slopes

被引:0
作者
Ahabchane, Chahid [1 ]
Cenesizoglu, Tolga [2 ,4 ]
Grass, Gunnar [2 ]
Jena, Sanjay Dominik [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Abitibi Temiscamingue, Dept Management Sci, Rouyn Noranda, PQ, Canada
[2] HEC Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec Montreal, Sch Management, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] 3000 Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
关键词
best order execution; machine learning models; time series models; ultra-high-frequency data; LIQUIDITY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1002/for.3164
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Market participants who need to trade a significant number of securities within a given period can face high transaction costs. In this paper, we document how improvements in intraday liquidity forecasts can help reduce total transaction costs. We compare various approaches for forecasting intraday transaction costs, including autoregressive and machine learning models, using comprehensive ultra-high-frequency limit order book data for a sample of NYSE stocks from 2002 to 2012. Our results indicate that improved liquidity forecasts can significantly decrease total transaction costs. Simple models capturing seasonality in market liquidity tend to outperform alternative models.
引用
收藏
页码:2982 / 3008
页数:27
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Abadi M, 2016, PROCEEDINGS OF OSDI'16: 12TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P265
[2]  
Almgren C., 1999, Risk, V12, P61
[3]  
Almgren R., 2007, Algorithmic Trading III: Precision, Control, Execution, V2007, P59
[4]  
Almgren R., 2001, J. Risk, V3, P5, DOI [DOI 10.21314/JOR.2001.041, 10.21314/JOR.2001.041]
[5]   Institutional Order Handling and Broker-Affiliated Trading Venues [J].
Anand, Amber ;
Samadi, Mehrdad ;
Sokobin, Jonathan ;
Venkataraman, Kumar .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2021, 34 (07) :3364-3402
[6]   Performance of Institutional Trading Desks: An Analysis of Persistence in Trading Costs [J].
Anand, Amber ;
Irvine, Paul ;
Puckett, Andy ;
Venkataraman, Kumar .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2012, 25 (02) :557-598
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Appl. Math. Finance
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Journal of Financial Markets, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1386-4181(97)00012-8
[9]  
Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
[10]   An Analysis of the Amihud Illiquidity Premium [J].
Brennan, Michael ;
Huh, Sahn-Wook ;
Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar .
REVIEW OF ASSET PRICING STUDIES, 2013, 3 (01) :133-176