Heterogeneity in Electric Vehicle Adoption: Indian Consumer Preferences

被引:2
作者
Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan [1 ]
Raj, Alok [2 ,3 ]
Sharma, Prateek [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Ranchi, Operat Management Dept, Ranchi 835303, India
[2] XLRI Xavier Inst Management, Jamshedpur 831001, India
[3] XLRI, Dept Prod Operat & Decis Sci, Jamshedpur 831001, India
[4] Indian Inst Management Udaipur, Finance & Accounting Dept, Udaipur 313001, India
关键词
Costs; Charging stations; Government; Electric vehicles; Streams; Decision making; Bibliographies; Consumer heterogeneity; lifestyle theory; neoclassical theory; risk-aversion; social influence; MODE CHOICE; INCENTIVES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2024.3404787
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article aims to explain the heterogeneity in individual purchasing decisions toward electric vehicles (EVs). To achieve this, we conducted a stated preference experiment among Indian consumers regarding EV adoption, using a two-stage integrated choice and latent variable model. Neoclassical and lifestyle theory is employed to examine consumers' purchasing decisions. Our findings indicate that consumers place more emphasis on the purchase price of EVs rather than the annual savings accrued from EV usage. Additionally, we observe that risk-averse behavior is negatively, while social influence is positively associated with the consumer's likelihood toward EVs. We categorize consumers into three segments: "conservative," "indifferent," and "enthusiast," to explain the heterogeneity in their preferences based on the charging station availability, annual usage, and household income. The article reveals that consumers in regions with fewer charging stations or those with low vehicle usage are more risk-averse compared to those in regions with a higher density of charging stations or higher vehicle usage. Regarding demographics, younger consumers and those with prior car experience are more inclined to adopt EVs. This article provides valuable insights that could assist governments and policymakers in formulating strategies to facilitate the adoption of EVs.
引用
收藏
页码:10833 / 10845
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the mode choice behaviour: A hybrid choice modelling approach [J].
Aaditya, Bh ;
Rahul, T. M. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2021, 108 :47-58
[2]   Why is electric vehicle uptake low in Atlantic Canada? A comparison to leading adoption provinces [J].
Abotalebi, Elnaz ;
Scott, Darren M. ;
Ferguson, Mark R. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 74 :289-298
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Trends in electric light-duty vehicles-Global EV outlook 2023-Analysis-IEA
[4]   What drives the Pioneers? Applying lifestyle theory to early electric vehicle buyers in Canada [J].
Axsen, Jonn ;
Cairns, Josh ;
Dusyk, Nichole ;
Goldberg, Suzanne .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 44 :17-30
[5]   Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers [J].
Axsen, Jonn ;
Bailey, Joseph ;
Castro, Marisol Andrea .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 :190-201
[6]   The Water, Energy, Food, and Sustainability Nexus Decision Environment: A Multistakeholder Transdisciplinary Approach [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (03) :656-670
[7]   Willingness to pay and attitudinal preferences of Indian consumers for electric vehicles [J].
Bansal, Prateek ;
Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan ;
Raj, Alok ;
Dubey, Subodh ;
Graham, Daniel J. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2021, 100 (100)
[8]   Classification of potential electric vehicle purchasers: A machine learning approach [J].
Bas, Javier ;
Cirillo, Cinzia ;
Cherchi, Elisabetta .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 168
[9]   Battery Electric Vehicle adoption in regions without strong policies [J].
Bruckmann, Gracia ;
Willibald, Fabian ;
Blanco, Victor .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 90
[10]   Technology adoption, consumer inattention and heuristic decision-making: Evidence from a UK district heating scheme [J].
Burlinson, Andrew ;
Giulietti, Monica ;
Battisti, Giuliana .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2018, 47 (10) :1873-1886