Empirical comparison of assembly complexity assessment approaches in manufacturing

被引:4
作者
Capponi, Matteo [1 ]
Mastrogiacomo, Luca [1 ]
Franceschini, Fiorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Management & Prod Engn DIGEP, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, Turin 10129, Italy
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM | 2025年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词
Assembly complexity; Assembly processes; Complexity assessment methods; Quality control; Manufacturing; ENGINEERING DESIGN; BASIC COMPLEXITY; PRODUCT DESIGN; MODEL; IMPACT; SYSTEMS; QUALITY; VARIETY; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1007/s12008-024-01896-x
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Investigating assembly complexity is a continuing concern within the manufacturing field, as it may impact the quality and costs of products. A growing body of literature is aimed at developing novel and reliable methods to assess assembly complexity. The first aim of this paper is to provide an extensive literature review, identifying the main approaches to this problem. Three main approaches emerged: product-centred approach, information-centred approach and system-centred approach. A second goal is to conduct a comparative analysis of these approaches, highlighting their advantages and limitations and providing guidance for process and product designers seeking to control assembly complexity. For each approach, a representative method was chosen, analysed in detail, and applied to five different real products. As concluding findings it was observed that product-centred approaches provide a more objective analysis, focusing strictly on product features. On the other hand, information-centred approaches focus on quantity and variety of information handled by assembly operators, thus proposing a valuable link between complexity and effort required. Finally, system-centred approaches provide a holistic assessment of assembly complexity which is typically only qualitative.
引用
收藏
页码:3219 / 3243
页数:25
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Abad Andres G., 2011, International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, V3, P313, DOI 10.1504/IJIDS.2011.043025
[2]  
Al-Zuheri Atiya, 2013, Journal of Computer Science, V9, P1822, DOI 10.3844/jcssp.2013.1822.1829
[3]   An experimental investigation on the relationship between perceived assembly complexity and product design complexity [J].
Alkan, Bugra .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2019, 13 (03) :1145-1157
[4]  
Alkan B, 2018, EUR J IND ENG, V12, P116
[5]   A Method to Assess Assembly Complexity of Industrial Products in Early Design Phase [J].
Alkan, Bugra ;
Vera, Daniel ;
Ahmad, Bilal ;
Harrison, Robert .
IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 :989-999
[6]   Engineering design complexity: an investigation of methods and measures [J].
Ameri, Farhad ;
Summers, Joshua D. ;
Mocko, Gregory M. ;
Porter, Matthew .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2008, 19 (2-3) :161-179
[7]   Novel method for shape complexity evaluation: a threshold from machining to additive manufacturing in the early design phase [J].
Ben Slama, Mouna ;
Chatti, Sami ;
Louhichi, Borhen .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2024, 35 (02) :191-214
[8]   A METHODOLOGY FOR ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY OPERATIONS DIFFICULTY [J].
BENARIEH, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1994, 32 (08) :1879-1895
[9]   PRODUCT DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURE AND ASSEMBLY [J].
BOOTHROYD, G .
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN, 1994, 26 (07) :505-520
[10]   The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance [J].
Bozarth, Cecil C. ;
Warsing, Donald P. ;
Flynn, Barbara B. ;
Flynn, E. James .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (01) :78-93