Protocol for the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) for clinical advice

被引:8
作者
CHART Collaborative
Huo, Bright [1 ]
McKechnie, Tyler [2 ]
Chartash, David [3 ,4 ]
Marshall, Iain J. [5 ]
Moher, David [6 ,7 ]
Ng, Jeremy Y.
Loder, Elizabeth [8 ,9 ]
Feeney, Timothy
Chan, An-Wen
Berkwits, Michael
Flanagin, Annette
Antoniou, Stavros A.
Laine, Christine
Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
Collins, Gary S.
Saha, Shirbani
Mathur, Piyush
Iorio, Alfonso
Lee, Yung
Samuel, Diana
Frankish, Helen
Ortenzi, Monica
Mayol, Julio
Lokker, Cynthia
Agoritsas, Thomas
Vandvik, Per Olav
Foroutan, Farid
Meerpohl, Joerg J.
Campos, Hugo
Canfield, Carolyn
Luo, Xufei
Chen, Yaolong
Harvey, Hugh
Loeb, Stacy
Agha, Riaz
Ramji, Karim
Ahmed, Hassaan
Boudreau, Vanessa
Guyatt, Gordon
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Biomed Informat & Data Sci, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Natl Univ Ireland, Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Kings Coll London, Sch Life Course & Populat Sci, London, England
[6] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ctr Journalol, Ottawa Methods Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[8] BMJ, London, England
[9] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
MEDICAL ETHICS; Natural Language Processing; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081155
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Large language model (LLM)-linked chatbots are being increasingly applied in healthcare due to their impressive functionality and public availability. Studies have assessed the ability of LLM-linked chatbots to provide accurate clinical advice. However, the methods applied in these Chatbot Assessment Studies are inconsistent due to the lack of reporting standards available, which obscures the interpretation of their study findings. This protocol outlines the development of the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) reporting guideline. Methods and analysis The development of the CHART reporting guideline will consist of three phases, led by the Steering Committee. During phase one, the team will identify relevant reporting guidelines with artificial intelligence extensions that are published or in development by searching preprint servers, protocol databases, and the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of health research Network. During phase two, we will conduct a scoping review to identify studies that have addressed the performance of LLM-linked chatbots in summarising evidence and providing clinical advice. The Steering Committee will identify methodology used in previous Chatbot Assessment Studies. Finally, the study team will use checklist items from prior reporting guidelines and findings from the scoping review to develop a draft reporting checklist. We will then perform a Delphi consensus and host two synchronous consensus meetings with an international, multidisciplinary group of stakeholders to refine reporting checklist items and develop a flow diagram. Ethics and dissemination We will publish the final CHART reporting guideline in peer-reviewed journals and will present findings at peer-reviewed meetings. Ethical approval was submitted to the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board and deemed "not required" in accordance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2) for the development of the CHART reporting guideline (#17025).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   ICMJE criteria for authorship: why the criticisms are not justified? [J].
Ali, Mohammad Javed .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 259 (02) :289-290
[2]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[3]   Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum [J].
Ayers, John W. ;
Poliak, Adam ;
Dredze, Mark ;
Leas, Eric C. ;
Zhu, Zechariah ;
Kelley, Jessica B. ;
Faix, Dennis J. ;
Goodman, Aaron M. ;
Longhurst, Christopher A. ;
Hogarth, Michael ;
Smith, Davey M. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 183 (06) :589-596
[4]   Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement [J].
Begg, C ;
Cho, M ;
Eastwood, S ;
Horton, R ;
Moher, D ;
Olkin, I ;
Pitkin, R ;
Rennie, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Simel, D ;
Stroup, DF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08) :637-639
[5]  
Bhirud N., 2019, International journal of scientific & technology research, V8, P225
[6]   Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios [J].
Cascella, Marco ;
Montomoli, Jonathan ;
Bellini, Valentina ;
Bignami, Elena .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 47 (01)
[7]  
Gholami S., 2023, arXiv, P1
[8]   Appropriateness of Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening Recommendations Provided by ChatGPT [J].
Haver, Hana L. ;
Ambinder, Emily B. ;
Bahl, Manisha ;
Oluyemi, Eniola T. ;
Jeudy, Jean ;
Yi, Paul H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (04)
[9]  
Krishna Vamsi G., 2023, IEEE, P1
[10]  
Liu XX, 2020, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V2, pE537, DOI [10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30218-1, 10.1136/bmj.m3164, 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30219-3]