Comparative outcome of single versus two double-pigtail stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with minimal necrosis: a retrospective analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Giri, S. [1 ]
Bhrugumalla, S. [1 ]
Gangadhar, S. [1 ]
Angadi, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nizams Inst Med Sci, Dept Gastroenterol, 4th floor,Specialty block, Hyderabad 500092, India
关键词
Endoscopic ultrasound; pseudocyst; cystogastrostomy; chronic pancreatitis; endoscopic stenting; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.51821/87.1.12118
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided cystogastrostomy is the treatment of choice for managing symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFC). However, studies on the number of stents for optimal drainage of PFCs are limited. Hence, the present study was conducted to compare the outcome of single versus two double-pigtail stents for endoscopic drainage of PFCs. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing endoscopic drainage of PFCs with minimal necrosis (pseudocyst or walled-off necrosis with <30% solid content) at a tertiary center in South India from October 2020 to October 2022. Post-procedure, patients were followed up for clinical improvement, and stents were removed after documentation of cyst size reduction on imaging. Results: Sixty-three patients (82.5% males, median age: 34 years) fulfilling the selection criteria were included. For single stent placement (n = 47), stents of size 8.5 Fr or 10 Fr were used, while for placement of two stents (n = 16), 7 Fr stents were used. The technical success rate was 100%. Intraprocedural and early post-procedural adverse events (all mild to moderate) were comparable between the groups (17.0% with single stent vs. 25.0% with two stents, p = NS). Clinical success was achieved in 93.6% of patients, with no difference between both groups. Three patients in the single stent group required additional procedures. All patients underwent successful stent removal after a median follow-up of 14 weeks. Conclusion: A single pigtail stent of 8.5 Fr or 10 Fr size for EUS-guided cystogastrostomy provides efficacy and safety similar to that of two stents.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: A comparative study between lumen-apposing metal stent and double-pigtail plastic stent
    Qiao, Weiguang
    Han, Zemin
    Liu, Side
    Zhi, Fachao
    Guo, Wen
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 539 - 539
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using double-pigtail plastic stents: A single tertiary center experience
    de Sousa, Giovana Biasia
    Machado, Rodrigo Strehl
    Nakao, Frank Shigueo
    Della Libera, Ermelindo
    CLINICS, 2021, 76
  • [3] EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates
    Lang, Gabriel D.
    Fritz, Cassandra
    Bhat, Trisha
    Das, Koushik K.
    Murad, Faris M.
    Early, Dayna S.
    Edmundowicz, Steven A.
    Kushnir, Vladimir M.
    Mullady, Daniel K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (01) : 150 - 157
  • [4] Technical and Clinical Outcomes of Using a Single Wide-Caliber Double-Pigtail Stent for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage: A Multicenter Prospective Study
    Ghoneem, Elsayed
    Okasha, Hussein
    Hammouda, Mohamed
    Gouda, Mohamed Fathi
    Soliman, Reham
    Shiha, Gamal
    Ragab, Khaled
    Agwa, Ramy Hassan
    GE PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 30 (06) : 414 - 421
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of lumen-apposing metal stents and double-pigtail plastic stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off necrosis; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khizar, Hayat
    Yufei, Hu
    Yanhua, Wu
    Wangyang, Chen
    Ying, Bian
    Chenyu, Le
    Zhicheng, Huang
    Ali, Kamran
    Jianfeng, Yang
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2023, 55 (01) : 578 - 591
  • [6] Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent With and Without Concurrent Double-Pigtail Plastic Stent for Pancreatic Fluid Collections: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Beran, Azizullah
    Mohamed, Mouhand F. H.
    Abdelfattah, Thaer
    Sarkis, Yara
    Montrose, Jonathan
    Sayeh, Wasef
    Musallam, Rami
    Jaber, Fouad
    Elfert, Khaled
    Montalvan-Sanchez, Eleazar
    Al-Haddad, Mohammad
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (02) : 59 - 67
  • [7] Is endoscopic drainage better than percutaneous drainage for patients with pancreatic fluid collections? A comparative meta-analysis
    Cai, Qi-Chen
    Zhang, Yu-Xin
    Liao, Yang
    Gong, Jian-Ping
    Xiong, Bin
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2021, 113 (06) : 454 - 462
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of metal versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: metal stents are advantageous
    Saunders, Rebecca
    Ramesh, Jayapal
    Cicconi, Silvia
    Evans, Jonathan
    Yip, Vincent S.
    Raraty, Michael
    Ghaneh, Paula
    Sutton, Robert
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    Halloran, Christopher
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (05): : 1412 - 1425
  • [9] Lumen-apposing metal stents versus traditional self-expanding metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tian, Yong
    Yin, Changjie
    Ma, Yihan
    Fu, Guochuan
    Liu, Rui
    Ran, Hongmei
    Pan, Tao
    Xiao, Yang
    Wen, Xudong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 38 (2): : 586 - 596
  • [10] Metal stents versus plastic stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials with trial sequential analysis
    Holanda, Erica Uchoa
    Fondelli, Andrew Agauleto
    Kleimmann, Rafael de Freitas
    Pauperio, Paula Motta
    Tschaen, Julia Mendes
    Fernandes, Matheus Vanzin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (03): : 1449 - 1461