The Value of Researcher Reflexivity in the Coproduction of Public Policy: A Practical Perspective

被引:1
作者
Nair, Yamini Cinamon [1 ]
Fabian, Mark [2 ]
机构
[1] Greater London Author, London, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Coventry, England
关键词
Coproduction; Public policy; Reflexivity; Positionality; Critical theory; PARTICIPATION; POWER;
D O I
10.1007/s10912-024-09853-1
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Coproduction of public policy involves bringing together technical experts, practitioners, and people with lived experience of that policy to collaboratively and deliberatively codesign it. Coproduction can leverage different ways of knowing and evaluative perspectives on a policy area to enhance the legitimacy and efficaciousness of policymaking. This article argues that researcher reflexivity is crucial for getting the most out of coproduction ethically and epistemically. By reflecting on our positionality, habitus, and biases, we can gain new insights into how we affect the research design, production and analysis of data, and communication of findings. This reflexivity helps to disrupt power dynamics that underly research and policymaking, helping to realise the radical potential of coproduction to democratise practice, empower citizens, and make research more relational. We demonstrate the value of reflexivity through an analysis of our work coproducing a theory of thriving in financial hardship in partnership with the UK national anti-poverty charity Turn2us. We contextualise our advocacy for reflexivity within the practical realities of advancing coproduction in the UK today.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Democratising Measurement: or Why Thick Concepts Call for Coproduction [J].
Alexandrova, Anna ;
Fabian, Mark .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (01)
[2]  
Barber R., 2012, Critical perspectives on user involvement
[3]  
Bennett F., 2004, From Input to Influence: Participatory Approaches to Research and Inquiry into Poverty
[4]  
Booth J, 2019, Social Change, V49, P276, DOI [10.1177/0049085719832401, 10.1177/0049085719832401, DOI 10.1177/0049085719832401]
[5]  
Bourdieu Pierre., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15
[6]   Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services [J].
Bovaird, Tony .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2007, 67 (05) :846-860
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[8]  
Bussu S., 2022, Understanding Developments in Participatory Governance. A Report on Findings From a Scoping Review of the Literature and Expert Interviews
[9]   How to communicate effectively with policymakers: Combine insights from psychology and policy studies [J].
Cairney P. ;
Kwiatkowski R. .
Palgrave Communications, 3 (1)
[10]  
Capps K., 2023, A defense of 'La Sombrita', LA's much-mocked bus-stop shade