Clinical efficacy of a two-piece abutment conforming to the concept of one abutment one time in the posterior region: A clinical pilot study

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Jimin [1 ]
Yang, Hang [1 ]
Zhu, Han [1 ]
El Khalil Bouhamed, Ibrahim [1 ]
Shen, Xiaoting [1 ]
Lu, Hongye [1 ,2 ]
He, Fuming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Zhejiang Prov Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Key Lab Oral Biomed Res Zhejiang Prov, Stomatol Hosp,Sch Stomatol,Sch Med,Canc Ctr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Dept Prosthodont, 166 QiuTao Rd N, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bone remodeling; definitive abutment; dental implants; one abutment one time; submerged healing; MARGINAL BONE LEVELS; PERI-IMPLANT; SOFT-TISSUES; DENTISTRY; MUCOSA; TEETH; WIDTH; TOOTH; HARD;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13349
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo assess the impact of a two-piece abutment workflow on enhancing the stability of the alveolar bone and gingiva surrounding the dental implant, and to determine the level of patient satisfaction. Materials and MethodsA total of 48 patients with dentition defect in the posterior region were included and divided into two groups: the two-piece abutment workflow (TAW) and the sealing screw with submerged healing workflow (SHW). Marginal bone level (MBL), soft tissue indicators, oral hygiene indicators, and patient satisfaction were assessed and recorded partially at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the change of MBL in different time periods. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to take into account the correlated nature of the data, and adjust for potential confounding factors within inter-group differences. ResultsThe survival rate of implants and prosthesis reached 100% at 12-month follow-up, with an average decrease of 0.25 mm (SD 0.23 mm) of MBL in the TAW group and 0.48 mm (SD 0.45 mm) in the SHW group. The change of MBL in the TAW group (0.15 +/- 0.31 mm) was significantly lower than the SHW group (0.41 +/- 0.41 mm) through the analysis of GLMM within 6 months, while no significance was found in 12 months. Moreover, less gingival pain and oppression during prosthesis loading, and less time consumption overall duration were showed in the TAW group through Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, p < 0.05). ConclusionsWithin a 6-month period, the two-piece abutment workflow showed superior efficacy in preserving the integrity of the marginal bone level. Furthermore, it streamlined treatment procedures and mitigated discomfort, hence increasing patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 776
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effect of one-time abutment placement on interproximal bone levels and peri-implant soft tissues: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Molina, Ana
    Sanz-Sanchez, Ignacio
    Martin, Conchita
    Blanco, Juan
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (04) : 443 - 452
  • [22] Clinical, radiographic, and biochemical evaluation of two-piece versus one-piece single implants with a laser-microgrooved collar surface after 5 years of functional loading
    Guarnieri, Renzo
    Reda, Rodolfo
    Di Nardo, Dario
    Miccoli, Gabriele
    Zanza, Alessio
    Testarelli, Luca
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05) : 676 - 682
  • [23] Comparative analysis of stress distribution in one-piece and two-piece implants with narrow and extra-narrow diameters: A finite element study
    Barbosa, Fabricia Teixeira
    Silveira Zanatta, Luiz Carlos
    Rendohl, Edelcio de Souza
    Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [24] A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations
    Drago, CJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (02) : 273 - 278
  • [25] In Vivo Evaluation of Two-Piece Implants Placed Following One-Stage and Two-Stage Surgical Protocol in Posterior Mandibular Region. Assessment of Alterations in Crestal Bone Level
    Gulati, Minkle
    Govila, Vivek
    Verma, Sunil
    Rajkumar, Balakrishnan
    Anand, Vishal
    Aggarwal, Anuj
    Jain, Nikil
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (05) : 854 - 861
  • [26] Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing one-piece and two-piece dental implants supporting fixed and removable dental prostheses: 4-to 6-year observations
    Gamper, Felix B.
    Benic, Goran I.
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Asgeirsson, Asgeir G.
    Haemmerle, Christoph H. F.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (12) : 1553 - 1559
  • [27] Two-piece zirconia versus titanium implants after 80 months: Clinical outcomes from a prospective randomized pilot trial
    Koller, Martin
    Steyer, Elisabeth
    Theisen, Kerstin
    Stagnell, Sami
    Jakse, Norbert
    Payer, Michael
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (04) : 388 - 396
  • [28] Five-year cohort prospective study on single implants in the esthetic area restored using one-abutment/one-time prosthetic approach
    Canullo, Luigi
    Omori, Yuki
    Amari, Yoshiyuki
    Iannello, Giuliano
    Pesce, Paolo
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (05) : 668 - 673
  • [29] Clinical Comparison of Screw-Retained and Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connections: One-Year Postloading Results
    Geckili, Esma
    Geckili, Onur
    Bilhan, Hakan
    Kutay, Omer
    Bilgin, Tayfun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (05) : 1123 - 1131
  • [30] Short strategic implants for mandibular removable partial dentures: One-year results from a pilot randomized crossover abutment type study
    Enkling, Norbert
    Nauli, Joel
    Kraus, Dominik
    Wittneben, Julia Gabriela
    Schimmel, Martin
    Abou-Ayash, Samir
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (10) : 1176 - 1189