Clinical efficacy of a two-piece abutment conforming to the concept of one abutment one time in the posterior region: A clinical pilot study

被引:0
|
作者
Jiang, Jimin [1 ]
Yang, Hang [1 ]
Zhu, Han [1 ]
El Khalil Bouhamed, Ibrahim [1 ]
Shen, Xiaoting [1 ]
Lu, Hongye [1 ,2 ]
He, Fuming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Zhejiang Prov Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Key Lab Oral Biomed Res Zhejiang Prov, Stomatol Hosp,Sch Stomatol,Sch Med,Canc Ctr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Dept Prosthodont, 166 QiuTao Rd N, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bone remodeling; definitive abutment; dental implants; one abutment one time; submerged healing; MARGINAL BONE LEVELS; PERI-IMPLANT; SOFT-TISSUES; DENTISTRY; MUCOSA; TEETH; WIDTH; TOOTH; HARD;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13349
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo assess the impact of a two-piece abutment workflow on enhancing the stability of the alveolar bone and gingiva surrounding the dental implant, and to determine the level of patient satisfaction. Materials and MethodsA total of 48 patients with dentition defect in the posterior region were included and divided into two groups: the two-piece abutment workflow (TAW) and the sealing screw with submerged healing workflow (SHW). Marginal bone level (MBL), soft tissue indicators, oral hygiene indicators, and patient satisfaction were assessed and recorded partially at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcome was the change of MBL in different time periods. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to take into account the correlated nature of the data, and adjust for potential confounding factors within inter-group differences. ResultsThe survival rate of implants and prosthesis reached 100% at 12-month follow-up, with an average decrease of 0.25 mm (SD 0.23 mm) of MBL in the TAW group and 0.48 mm (SD 0.45 mm) in the SHW group. The change of MBL in the TAW group (0.15 +/- 0.31 mm) was significantly lower than the SHW group (0.41 +/- 0.41 mm) through the analysis of GLMM within 6 months, while no significance was found in 12 months. Moreover, less gingival pain and oppression during prosthesis loading, and less time consumption overall duration were showed in the TAW group through Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, p < 0.05). ConclusionsWithin a 6-month period, the two-piece abutment workflow showed superior efficacy in preserving the integrity of the marginal bone level. Furthermore, it streamlined treatment procedures and mitigated discomfort, hence increasing patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 776
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Digital One-Abutment/One-Time Concept. A Clinical Report
    Beuer, Florian
    Groesser, Julian
    Schweiger, Josef
    Hey, Jeremias
    Gueth, Jan-Frederik
    Stimmelmayr, Michael
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (07): : 580 - 585
  • [2] The effect of one-time abutment placement on clinical and radiographic outcomes: A 5-year randomized clinical trial
    Sanz-Sanchez, Ignacio
    Molina, Ana
    Martin, Conchita
    Bollain, Juan
    Calatrava, Javier
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (06) : 609 - 620
  • [3] One-Abutment at One-Time in Posterior Edentulism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kang, Yujie
    Zheng, Xianghuai
    Zhang, Danya
    Li, Shaobing
    Xu, Shulan
    Chen, Lei
    Zhang, Zhaoqiang
    Lin, Xi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (08) : E720 - E724
  • [4] One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study
    Rios-Santos, Jose Vicente
    Tello-Gonzalez, Gregorio
    Lazaro-Calvo, Pedro
    Gil Mur, Francisco Javier
    Rios-Carrasco, Blanca
    Fernandez-Palacin, Ana
    Herrero-Climent, Mariano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (24) : 1 - 17
  • [5] The Association of the One-Abutment at One-Time Concept with Marginal Bone Loss around the SLA and Platform Switch and Conical Abutment Implants
    Hamudi, Nasreen
    Barnea, Eitan
    Weinberg, Evgeny
    Laviv, Amir
    Mijiritsky, Eitan
    Matalon, Shlomo
    Chaushu, Liat
    Kolerman, Roni
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [6] One-Piece Versus Two-Piece Abutments for Single Crowns in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Trial
    Pascoal, Ana Luisa de Barros
    Paiva, Keiverton Rones Gurgel
    de Araujo, Lidya Nara Marques
    Marinho, Liliane Cristina Nogueira
    Gurgel, Bruno Cesar de Vasconcelos
    Dantas, Wagner Ranier Maciel
    Oliveira, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli da Costa
    Calderon, Patricia dos Santos
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025, 36 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [7] Two digital strategies in modern implantology - root-analogue implants and the digital one-abutment/one-time concept
    Schubert, O.
    Beuer, F.
    Gueth, J-F
    Nold, E.
    Edelhoff, D.
    Metz, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2018, 21 (02) : 115 - 131
  • [8] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of a two-piece ceramic implant: one year results from a prospective clinical trial
    da Silva, Alexandre Marques Paes
    dos Santos, Francisco Augusto Horta
    Mota, Rodrigo Franco
    Teixeira, Mayla Kezy Silva
    Telles, Daniel Moraes
    Lourenco, Eduardo Jose Veras
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 28 (07)
  • [9] Clinical and radiographic performance of one-piece and two-piece implant: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Mengqi
    He, Lulu
    Wang, Hang
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2021, 65 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [10] A multicenter cohort study on the association of the one-abutment one-time concept with marginal bone loss around bone level implants
    Lambrechts, Tijs
    Doornewaard, Ron
    De Bruyckere, Thomas
    Matthijs, Liesbet
    Deschepper, Ellen
    Cosyn, Jan
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (02) : 192 - 202