Model selection for long-term load forecasting under uncertainty

被引:0
作者
Thangjam, Aditya [1 ]
Jaipuria, Sanjita [1 ]
Dadabada, Pradeep Kumar [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Operat & Quantitat Tech, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Shillong, Informat Syst & Analyt, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
关键词
Long-term load forecasting; Polynomial regression; Quantile polynomial regression; Ex-ante; Ex-post; Uncertainty; Backward feature elimination; ELECTRICITY DEMAND; FRAMEWORK; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1108/JM2-09-2023-0211
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to propose a systematic model selection procedure for long-term load forecasting (LTLF) for ex-ante and ex-post cases considering uncertainty in exogenous predictors.Design/methodology/approachThe different variants of regression models, namely, Polynomial Regression (PR), Generalised Additive Model (GAM), Quantile Polynomial Regression (QPR) and Quantile Spline Regression (QSR), incorporating uncertainty in exogenous predictors like population, Real Gross State Product (RGSP) and Real Per Capita Income (RPCI), temperature and indicators of breakpoints and calendar effects, are considered for LTLF. Initially, the Backward Feature Elimination procedure is used to identify the optimal set of predictors for LTLF. Then, the consistency in model accuracies is evaluated using point and probabilistic forecast error metrics for ex-ante and ex-post cases.FindingsFrom this study, it is found PR model outperformed in ex-ante condition, while QPR model outperformed in ex-post condition. Further, QPR model performed consistently across validation and testing periods. Overall, QPR model excelled in capturing uncertainty in exogenous predictors, thereby reducing over-forecast error and risk of overinvestment.Research limitations/implicationsThese findings can help utilities to align model selection strategies with their risk tolerance.Originality/valueTo propose the systematic model selection procedure in this study, the consistent performance of PR, GAM, QPR and QSR models are evaluated using point forecast accuracy metrics Mean Absolute Percentage Error, Root Mean Squared Error and probabilistic forecast accuracy metric Pinball Score for ex-ante and ex-post cases considering uncertainty in the considered exogenous predictors such as RGSP, RPCI, population and temperature.
引用
收藏
页码:2227 / 2247
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, A timeline of COVID-19 developments in 2020
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, CLIM DAT ONL
  • [3] Novel effects of demand side management data on accuracy of electrical energy consumption modeling and long-term forecasting
    Ardakani, F. J.
    Ardehali, M. M.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 : 745 - 752
  • [4] Deep learning framework to forecast electricity demand
    Bedi, Jatin
    Toshniwal, Durga
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 238 : 1312 - 1326
  • [5] How to model European electricity load profiles using artificial neural networks
    Behm, Christian
    Nolting, Lars
    Praktiknjo, Aaron
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 277
  • [6] Forecasting peak electricity demand for Los Angeles considering higher air temperatures due to climate change
    Burillo, Daniel
    Chester, Mikhail V.
    Pincetl, Stephanie
    Fournier, Eric D.
    Reyna, Janet
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 236 : 1 - 9
  • [7] Long term load forecasting accuracy in electric utility integrated resource planning
    Carvallo, Juan Pablo
    Larsen, Peter H.
    Sanstad, Alan H.
    Goldman, Charles A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 119 : 410 - 422
  • [8] Linear optimal weighting estimator (LOWE) for efficient parallel hybridization ofload forecasts
    Chahkotahi, Fatemeh
    Khashei, Mehdi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2021, : 1028 - 1048
  • [9] Davydenko A, 2015, BUSINESS FORECASTING: PRACTICAL PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS, P238
  • [10] Multi criteria decision making with machine-learning based load forecasting methods for techno-economic and environmentally sustainable distributed hybrid energy solution
    Dutta, Risav
    Das, Sayan
    De, Sudipta
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 291