Understanding fraudulence in online qualitative studies: From the researcher's perspective

被引:9
作者
Panicker, Aswati [1 ]
Nurain, Novia [1 ]
Ibrahim, Zaidat [1 ]
Wang, Chun-Han [2 ]
Ha, Seung Wan [2 ]
Wu, Yuxing [1 ]
Connelly, Kay [3 ]
Siek, Katie A. [1 ]
Chung, Chia-Fang [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYTEMS (CHI 2024) | 2024年
关键词
fraudulence; deception; qualitative research; online studies; human research participants; ethics; data integrity; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1145/3613904.3642732
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Researchers are increasingly facilitating qualitative research studies online. While this has made research more accessible for participation, there have been notable encounters with "fraudulent" participants. By fraudulent, we refer to individuals who are deceptive about meeting the inclusion criteria, their identity, or experiences. Fraudulent participants have generated new challenges for researchers who have to interact 1:1 with these individuals, face ethical dilemmas on appropriate next steps, diagnose and prevent the issue from happening again, and deal with their own identity as a scholar. In this study, we interview 16 HCI researchers to understand and learn from their experiences. We contribute: (1) an understanding of how HCI qualitative researchers deal with fraudulent participants; (2) a guide for qualitative HCI researchers on how to handle fraudulence; and (3) a reflection on how the HCI research community might better improve our science and training efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Using HCI in Cross-Disciplinary Teams: A Case Study of Academic Collaboration in HCI-Health Teams in the US Using a Team Science Perspective [J].
Agapie E. ;
Haldar S. ;
Poblete S.G. .
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2022, 6 (CSCW2)
[2]   Ethics in Qualitative Research: A View of the Participants' and Researchers' World from a Critical Standpoint [J].
Aluwihare-Samaranayake, Dilmi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2012, 11 (02) :64-81
[3]  
Andrew Lesley, 2024, Ethics Hum Res, V46, P37, DOI 10.1002/eahr.500198
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Ways of Knowing in HCI, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_11, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8-11]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Research Ethics and HCI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-818
[6]   Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants [J].
Archibald, Mandy M. ;
Ambagtsheer, Rachel C. ;
Casey, Mavourneen G. ;
Lawless, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2019, 18
[7]   Fraud Detection Protocol for Web-Based Research Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Development and Descriptive Evaluation [J].
Ballard, April M. ;
Cardwell, Trey ;
Young, April M. .
JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2019, 5 (01) :80-89
[8]  
Ballou Nick, 2021, P 2021 CHI C HUM FAC, DOI [10.1145/3411764.3445584, DOI 10.1145/3411764.3445584]
[9]   A COVID-19-era rapid review: using Zoom and Skype for qualitative group research [J].
Boland, Joshua ;
Banks, Susan ;
Krabbe, Robin ;
Lawrence, Suanne ;
Murray, Therese ;
Henning, Terese ;
Vandenberg, Miriam .
PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2022, 32 (02)
[10]   Using Thematic Analysis in Healthcare HCI at CHI: A Scoping Review [J].
Bowman, Robert ;
Nadal, Camille ;
Morrissey, Kellie ;
Thieme, Anja ;
Doherty, Gavin .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2023), 2023,