Evaluation of the QMAC-dRAST System Version 2.5 for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Broth and Subcultured Colony Isolates

被引:2
作者
Kim, Tae Yeul [1 ]
Kang, Minhee [2 ,3 ]
Shim, Hyang Jin [4 ]
Kang, On-Kyun [1 ]
Huh, Hee Jae [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Nam Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Lab Med & Genet, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Samsung Med Ctr, Smart Healthcare Res Inst, Biomed Engn Res Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Med Device Management & Res, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Samsung Med Ctr, Samsung Biomed Res Inst, Ctr Clin Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; bloodstream infections; broth microdilution; Gram-negative; positive blood culture broth; QMAC-dRAST; VITEK; 2; TURNAROUND TIME; VITEK-2; SYSTEM; IDENTIFICATION; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1002/jcla.25043
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioM & eacute;rieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method. Methods We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates. Results For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates. Conclusions The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria collected from countries in Eastern Europe: results from the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST) 2004-2010
    Balode, Arta
    Punda-Polic, Volga
    Dowzicky, Michael J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 41 (06) : 527 - 535
  • [42] Direct inoculation method using BacT/ALERT 3D and BD Phoenix System allows rapid and accurate identification and susceptibility testing for both Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative rods in aerobic blood cultures
    Yonetani, Shota
    Okazaki, Mitsuhiro
    Araki, Koji
    Makino, Hiroshi
    Fukugawa, Yoko
    Okuyama, Takahiro
    Ohnishi, Hiroaki
    Watanabe, Takashi
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2012, 73 (02) : 129 - 134
  • [43] Colistin Susceptibility Testing by Colistin Broth Disk Elution MIC Method among Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Blood Culture Clinical Isolates in a Tertiary Care Setting, East Delhi, India
    Nirmal, Kirti
    Singh, Narendra Pal
    Sarkar, Krishna
    Goyal, Nisha
    Gangar, Seema
    Dwivedi, Aditya Nath
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2023, 33 (05) : 743 - 750
  • [44] Direct-from-Blood-Culture Disk Diffusion To Determine Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Preliminary Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group
    Chandrasekaran, Sukantha
    Abbott, April
    Campeau, Shelley
    Zimmer, Barbara L.
    Weinstein, Melvin
    Thrupp, Lauri
    Hejna, John
    Walker, Lindsey
    Ammann, Tracy
    Kirn, Thomas
    Patel, Robin
    Humphries, Romney M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (03)
  • [45] Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures using the Vitek 2 system: comparison of two rapid protocols
    Porte, Lorena
    Gattini, Francesca
    Varela, Carmen
    Weitzel, Thomas
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2017, 34 (02): : 190 - +
  • [46] Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using the MicroScan System: Performance Evaluation of a 4-Hour Bacterial Cultivation From Positive Blood Cultures
    Krueger, Alexander
    Koerber-Irrgang, Barbara
    Flueh, Greta
    Gielen, Joerg
    Scholz, Claus-Juergen
    Wisplinghoff, Hilmar
    Jazmati, Nathalie
    CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 81 (08)
  • [47] Rapid Identification of Gram-Negative Bacteria with and without CTX-M Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase from Positive Blood Culture Bottles by PCR Followed by Microchip Gel Electrophoresis
    Fujita, Shin-ichi
    Yosizaki, Kentaro
    Ogushi, Thikako
    Uechi, Kouhei
    Takemori, Yukiko
    Senda, Yasuko
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 49 (04) : 1483 - 1488
  • [48] Direct Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Bottles by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and the Vitek 2 System
    Jo, Sung Jin
    Park, Kang Gyun
    Han, Kyungja
    Park, Dong Jin
    Park, Yeon-Joon
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 36 (02) : 117 - 123