Analysis of factors affecting the estimation of the multi-GNSS satellite differential code biases (SDCBs)

被引:0
作者
Wang, Yifan [1 ]
Li, Min [2 ]
Yuan, Yunbin [2 ]
Wen, Gang [1 ]
Zhou, Fangrong [1 ]
Geng, Hao [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Power Grid Co Ltd, Elect Power Res Inst, Joint Lab Power Remote Sensing Technol, Kunming 650217, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Innovat Acad Precis Measurement Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Geodesy & Earths Dynam, Wuhan, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Multi-GNSS; Satellite differential code biases (SDCBs); Factor; Ionosphere; Total electron content (TEC); INSTRUMENTAL BIASES; IONOSPHERIC DELAY; RECEIVER; BEIDOU; MODEL; IMPACT; SLANT; VTEC; IGS; TEC;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.041
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The satellite hardware differential code biases (SDCBs) are one of the important factors affecting the accuracy of GNSS-based ionospheric total electron content (TEC) estimation. The accuracy of SDCB estimates is directly influenced by the data processing methodology. To analyze the impact of various factors on multi-GNSS SDCB estimation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the number of contributed stations, the data sampling rate, the contributed satellite systems, and the cut-off elevation angle. Two sets of GNSS data obtained from the International GNSS Service (IGS) multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) network, covering both high and low solar activities during the ascending phase of solar cycle 25, were processed to estimate multi-GNSS SDCBs. The results indicate that the number of contributed stations is the primary factor that influences multi-GNSS SDCB estimation. To achieve a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy, a data sampling rate of 540 s is recommended, which results in a multi-GNSS SDCB root-mean-square (RMS) error of less than 0.01 ns compared to a 60-second sampling rate. The stability of SDCBs is hardly affected by incorporating observations from multiple GNSS systems, and the differences of the standard deviations of SDCBs for quad-, triple- and dual-system solutions are below 0.002 ns. Additionally, the results indicate that the optimal cutoff elevation angle for multi-GNSS SDCB estimation is between 20 degrees and 30 degrees, which ensures the best stability in the estimated multi-GNSS SDCBs. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 74
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Banville S, 2012, I NAVIG SAT DIV INT, P2692
[2]   Accuracy assessment of the GPS-based slant total electron content [J].
Brunini, Claudio ;
Javier Azpilicueta, Francisco .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2009, 83 (08) :773-785
[3]   The influence of grounding on GPS receiver differential code biases [J].
Choi, Byung-Kyu ;
Lee, Sang Jeong .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (02) :457-463
[4]   Receiver DCB Estimation and Analysis by Types of GPS Receiver [J].
Choi, Byung-Kyu ;
Chung, Jong-Kyun ;
Cho, Jeong-Ho .
JOURNAL OF ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2010, 27 (02) :123-128
[5]   Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS [J].
Ciraolo, L. ;
Azpilicueta, F. ;
Brunini, C. ;
Meza, A. ;
Radicella, S. M. .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2007, 81 (02) :111-120
[6]  
Dach R., 2015, Bernese GNSS Software Version 5 i, DOI DOI 10.7892/BORIS.72297
[7]   The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998 [J].
Hernandez-Pajares, M. ;
Juan, J. M. ;
Sanz, J. ;
Orus, R. ;
Garcia-Rigo, A. ;
Feltens, J. ;
Komjathy, A. ;
Schaer, S. C. ;
Krankowski, A. .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2009, 83 (3-4) :263-275
[8]   Methodology and consistency of slant and vertical assessments for ionospheric electron content models [J].
Hernandez-Pajares, Manuel ;
Roma-Dollase, David ;
Krankowski, Andrzej ;
Garcia-Rigo, Alberto ;
Orus-Perez, Raul .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2017, 91 (12) :1405-1414
[9]  
Joachim F., 2003, GPS Solutions, V7, P41, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10291-003-0051-9
[10]   Factors affecting the estimation of GPS receiver instrumental biases [J].
Kao, S. ;
Tu, Y. ;
Chen, W. ;
Weng, D. J. ;
Ji, S. Y. .
SURVEY REVIEW, 2013, 44 (328) :59-67