Association between plasma circulating tumor DNA and the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients: a meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
Zhang, Haowen [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Tao [3 ,4 ]
Peng, Yuhao [1 ,2 ]
Luan, Siyuan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaokun [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Yong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Thorac Surg, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Inst Thorac Oncol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Gastr Canc Ctr, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Biotherapy & Canc Ctr, Lab Gastr Canc,State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
circulating tumor DNA; esophageal cancer; meta-analysis; prognosis; risk stratification; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LIQUID BIOPSY; ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOMARKER; CTDNA;
D O I
10.1097/JS9.0000000000001373
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The application of liquid biopsy analysis utilizing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained prominence as a biomarker in specific cancer types. Nevertheless, the correlation between ctDNA and the prognostic outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) remains a subject of controversy. This meta-analysis aims to assess the correlation between ctDNA and the prognosis of EC patients. Methods: The authors systematically explored Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database to identify studies reporting on the prognostic value of ctDNA in EC patients before November 2023. The primary outcome involved the determine of associations between ctDNA with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well asprogression-free survival (PFS) among EC patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed a detailed subgroup analysis in the setting of EC, including parameters such as detection time, histological subtypes, treatment modalities, regions, anatomic locations, and detection methods. Publication bias was assessed utilizing Begg's test, Egger's test, and funnel plots. A sensitivity analysis was conducted by systematically excluding individual studies to evaluate the stability of the results. Results: A total of 1203 studies were initially screened, from which 13 studies underwent further analysis, encompassing 604 patients diagnosed with EC. The comprehensive pooled analysis indicated a significant association between the detection of ctDNA and poor OS (HR: 3.65; 95% CI: 1.97-6.75, P<0.001), DFS/RFS (HR: 6.08; 95% CI: 1.21-30.50, P<0.001), and PFS (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 1.94-4.16, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that ctDNA remained a consistent negative predictor of OS when stratified by different detection time, histological subtypes, regions, anatomic locations, and detection methods. Furthermore, subgroup analysis stratified by regions and study types demonstrated an association between ctDNA detection and poor PFS in EC patients. Conclusion: Our results indicate plasma ctDNA may serve as robust prognostic markers for OS, DFS/RFS, and PFS among EC patients. This finding suggests that plasma ctDNA could offer a highly effective approach for risk stratification and personalized medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:4370 / 4381
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[51]   Clinical Application of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Genetic Analysis of Patients with Advanced GIST [J].
Xu, Hao ;
Chen, Liang ;
Shao, Yang ;
Zhu, Dongqin ;
Zhi, Xiaofei ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Li, Fengyuan ;
Xu, Jianghao ;
Liu, Xisheng ;
Xu, Zekuan .
MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 17 (01) :290-296
[52]   Unraveling the Complexity of Regulated Cell Death in Esophageal Cancer: from Underlying Mechanisms to Targeted Therapeutics [J].
Zhang, Haowen ;
Zhang, Jin ;
Luan, Siyuan ;
Liu, Zhiying ;
Li, Xiaokun ;
Liu, Bo ;
Yuan, Yong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 19 (12) :3831-3868
[53]   Liquid biopsy at the frontier of detection, prognosis and progression monitoring in colorectal cancer [J].
Zhou, Hui ;
Zhu, Liyong ;
Song, Jun ;
Wang, Guohui ;
Li, Pengzhou ;
Li, Weizheng ;
Luo, Ping ;
Sun, Xulong ;
Wu, Jin ;
Liu, Yunze ;
Zhu, Shaihong ;
Zhang, Yi .
MOLECULAR CANCER, 2022, 21 (01)