Thermal runaway and gas production characteristics of semi-solid electrolyte and liquid electrolyte lithium-Ion batteries: A comparative study

被引:19
作者
Lin, Chunjing [1 ,2 ]
Yan, Hongtao [1 ]
Qi, Chuang [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Zhenyan [1 ]
Liu, Dinghong [4 ]
Liu, Xi [1 ]
Lao, Li [3 ]
Li, Zhaoyang [4 ]
Sun, Yazhou [5 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ Technol, Key Lab Adv Mfg Technol Automobile Parts, Minist Educ, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] CATARC Automot Test Ctr Changzhou Co Ltd, Changzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Chogqing Tsingshan Ind Co Ltd, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] CATARC Changzhou Automot Engn Res Inst Co Ltd, Changzhou, Peoples R China
[5] SINOEV Technol Inc, Hefei, Peoples R China
关键词
Lithium-ion battery; Semi-solid electrolyte; Liquid electrolyte; Thermal runaway; Gas composition; Explode limit; PROPAGATION BEHAVIOR; STABILITY; PERFORMANCE; LIFEPO4; ABUSE; CELLS; STATE; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2024.06.111
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Solid-state electrolytes have attracted considerable attention as an alternative to liquid electrolytes for lithiumion batteries. This study compares the thermal runaway and gas production of two commercially available lithium-ion batteries (i.e., the liquid electrolyte lithium iron phosphate battery (LFP-L) and the semi-solid electrolyte lithium iron phosphate battery (LFP-SS)) under different environments and states of charge (SOCs). The main findings include the following aspects: Regarding thermal runaway characteristics and gas production kinetics, LFP-SS exhibits a slower temperature rise rate but a higher per Ah pressure increase. The total gas production volume of LFP-SS is lower, but the gas production volume per Ah is approximately 1.5 times that of LFP-L batteries. The LFP-L produces gas rate per Ah more rapidly than the LFP-SS. As for the produced gas components, LFP-L has higher concentrations of H2 and hydrocarbons than LFP-SS. Concerning explosion limits, both the upper and lower explosion limits of LFP-SS are higher than those of LFP-L at 100 % SOC. However, for 110 % SOC, the upper explosion limit of LFP-SS is lower than that of LFP-L. Quantitative analysis of the safety performance of these batteries under different conditions shows that LFP-SS exhibits the best safety performance at 100 % SOC in a nitrogen environment. These results are hoped to guide battery selection and safety protection design for lithium-ion battery packs.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 586
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Explosion hazards from lithium-ion battery vent gas [J].
Baird, Austin R. ;
Archibald, Erik J. ;
Marr, Kevin C. ;
Ezekoye, Ofodike A. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2020, 446 (446)
[2]   Gas Evolution in All-Solid-State Battery Cells [J].
Bartsch, Timo ;
Strauss, Florian ;
Hatsukade, Toni ;
Schiele, Alexander ;
Kim, A-Young ;
Hartmann, Pascal ;
Janek, Juergen ;
Brezesinski, Torsten .
ACS ENERGY LETTERS, 2018, 3 (10) :2539-2543
[3]   Correlation of aging and thermal stability of commercial 18650-type lithium ion batteries [J].
Boerner, M. ;
Friesen, A. ;
Gruetzke, M. ;
Stenzel, Y. P. ;
Brunklaus, G. ;
Haetge, J. ;
Nowak, S. ;
Schappacher, F. M. ;
Winter, M. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2017, 342 :382-392
[4]  
Chaochao G., 2016, J. Saf. Sci. Technol.
[5]   Lower explosion limit of the vented gases from Li-ion batteries thermal runaway in high temperature condition [J].
Chen, Shichen ;
Wang, Zhirong ;
Wang, Jinghong ;
Tong, Xuan ;
Yan, Wei .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2020, 63
[6]  
Chen Zeyu, 2019, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, V55, P93
[7]  
Du Pasquier A., 1998, Fuel Energy Abstr., V39, P358
[8]   Thermal stability of Lithium-ion batteries: Case study of NMC811 and LFP cathode materials [J].
El Moutchou, S. ;
Aziam, H. ;
Mansori, M. ;
Saadoune, I .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 51 :A1-A7
[9]   Comparing Different Thermal Runaway Triggers for Two Automotive Lithium-Ion Battery Cell Types [J].
Essl, C. ;
Golubkov, A. W. ;
Fuchs, A. .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 167 (13)
[10]   Mitigating Thermal Runaway of Lithium-Ion Batteries [J].
Feng, Xuning ;
Ren, Dongsheng ;
He, Xiangming ;
Ouyang, Minggao .
JOULE, 2020, 4 (04) :743-770