Do negative screening test results cause false reassurance? A systematic review

被引:22
作者
Cooper, Grace C. [1 ]
Harvie, Michelle N. [1 ]
French, David P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp South Manchester NHS Fdn Trust, Nightingale & Prevent Breast Canc Ctr, Wythenshawe, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Manchester Ctr Hlth Psychol, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
certificate of health effect; false reassurance; negative screening test result; screening; systematic review; PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT; FOLLOW-UP; TRIAL; LUNG; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/bjhp.12265
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
PurposeIt has been suggested that receiving a negative screening test result may cause false reassurance or have a certificate of health effect'. False reassurance in those receiving a negative screening test result may result in them wrongly believing themselves to be at lower risk of the disease, and consequently less likely to engage in health-related behaviours that would lower their risk. MethodsThe present systematic review aimed to identify the evidence regarding false reassurance effects due to negative screening test results in adults (over 18years) screened for the presence of a disease or its precursors, where disease or precursors are linked to lifestyle behaviours. MEDLINE and PsycINFO were searched for trials that compared a group who had received negative screening results to an unscreened control group. The following outcomes were considered as markers of false reassurance: perceived risk of disease; anxiety and worry about disease; health-related behaviours or intention to change health-related behaviours (i.e., smoking, diet, physical activity, and alcohol consumption); self-rated health status. ResultsNine unique studies were identified, reporting 55 measures in relation to the outcomes considered. Outcomes were measured at various time points from immediately following screening to up to 11years after screening. Despite considerable variation in outcome measures used and timing of measurements, effect sizes for comparisons between participants who received negative screening test results and control participants were typically small with few statistically significant differences. There was evidence of high risk of bias, and measures of behaviours employed were often not valid. ConclusionsThe limited evidence base provided little evidence of false reassurance following a negative screening test results on any of four outcomes examined. False reassurance should not be considered a significant harm of screening, but further research is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:958 / 977
页数:20
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1968, 34 WHO
[2]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Criteria for appraising the viability, effectiveness and appropriateness of a screening programme
[4]   Effect of CT screening on smoking habits at 1-year follow-up in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST) [J].
Ashraf, H. ;
Tonnesen, P. ;
Pedersen, J. Holst ;
Dirksen, A. ;
Thorsen, H. ;
Dossing, M. .
THORAX, 2009, 64 (05) :388-392
[5]   The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Ashton, HA ;
Buxton, MJ ;
Day, NE ;
Kim, LG ;
Marteau, TM ;
Scott, RAP ;
Thomspon, SG ;
Walker, NM .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9345) :1531-1539
[6]   Long-term lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial [J].
Berstad, Paula ;
Loberg, Magnus ;
Larsen, Inger Kristin ;
Kalager, Mette ;
Holme, Oyvind ;
Botteri, Edoardo ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Hoff, Geir .
GUT, 2015, 64 (08) :1268-1276
[7]   Emotional impact of screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Collins, Ruth E. ;
Lopez, Laureen M. ;
Marteau, Theresa M. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
[8]   The effects of screening on health behaviour: a summary of the results of randomized controlled trials [J].
Deutekom, Marije ;
Vansenne, Fleur ;
McCaffery, Kirsten ;
Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise ;
Stronks, Karien ;
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 33 (01) :71-79
[9]   Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial [J].
Eborall, Helen C. ;
Griffin, Simon J. ;
Prevost, A. Toby ;
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise ;
French, David P. ;
Sutton, Stephen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7618) :486-489
[10]   CONVINCING EVIDENCE FROM CONTROLLED AND UNCONTROLLED STUDIES ON THE LIPID-LOWERING EFFECT OF A STATIN [J].
Higgins, Julian .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (12)