Palliative Care Research and Clinical Practice Priorities in the United States as Identified by an Interdisciplinary Modified Delphi Approach

被引:1
作者
Petchler, Claire M. [1 ]
Singer-Cohen, Rebecca [1 ]
Fisher, Marlena C. [1 ]
Degroot, Lyndsay [2 ]
Gamper, Mary Jo [1 ]
Nelson, Katie E. [3 ]
Peeler, Anna [5 ]
Koirala, Binu [1 ]
Morrison, Megan [6 ]
Saylor, Martha Abshire [1 ]
Sloan, Danetta [3 ,4 ]
Wright, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, 525 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Gen internal Med, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Kings Coll London, Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, London, England
[6] Inova Hlth Syst Geriatr & Palliat Med, Dept Geriatr & Palliat Med, Falls Church, VA USA
关键词
Delphi consensus methodology; palliative care clinical practice; palliative care research; RESIDENTS; FRAMEWORK; GROWTH; CANCER; KEY;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2023.0664
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Palliative care demands in the United States are growing amid a comparatively small workforce of palliative care clinicians and researchers. Therefore, determining research and clinical practice priorities is essential for streamlining initiatives to advance palliative care science and practice. Objectives: To identify and rank palliative care research and clinical practice priority areas through expert consensus. Design: Using a modified Delphi method, U.S. palliative care experts identified and ranked priority areas in palliative care research and clinical practice. Priorities were thematically grouped and analyzed for topic content and frequency; univariate analysis used the median of each priority item ranking, with a cutoff median of <= 8 indicating >76% agreement for an item's ranking. Results: In total, 27 interdisciplinary pediatric and adult palliative care experts representing 19 different academic institutions and medical centers participated in the preliminary survey and the first Delphi round, and 22 participated in the second Delphi round. The preliminary survey generated 78 initial topics, which were developed into 22 priority areas during the consensus meeting. The top five priorities were (1) access to palliative care, (2) equity in palliative care, (3) adequate financing of palliative care, (4) provision of palliative care in primary care settings, and (5) palliative care workforce challenges. Conclusions: These expert-identified priority areas provide guidance for researchers and practitioners to develop innovative models, policies, and interventions, thereby enriching the quality of life for those requiring palliative care services.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1145
页数:11
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, DYING AM IMPR QUAL H
  • [2] Primary palliative care competency framework for primary care and family physicians in India-Collaborative work by Indian Association of Palliative Care and Academy of Family Physicians of India
    Atreya, Shrikant
    Jeba, Jenifer
    Pease, Nikki
    Thyle, Ann
    Murray, Scott
    Barnard, Alan
    Munday, Dan
    Mathews, Lulu
    Leng, Mhoira
    Palat, Gayatri
    Ganesh, Alka
    Chakraborty, Sulagna
    Anbarasi, Sahaya
    Kumar, Raman
    Muckaden, Maryann
    Grant, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2019, 8 (08) : 2563 - 2567
  • [3] The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers
    Bajwah, Sabrina
    Oluyase, Adejoke O.
    Yi, Deokhee
    Gao, Wei
    Evans, Catherine J.
    Grande, Gunn
    Todd, Chris
    Costantini, Massimo
    Murtagh, Fliss E.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (09):
  • [4] Forging a New Frontier: Providing Palliative Care to People With Cancer in Rural and Remote Areas
    Bakitas, Marie
    Watts, Kristen Allen
    Malone, Emily
    Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
    McCammon, Susan
    Taylor, Richard
    Tucker, Rodney
    Elk, Ronit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (09) : 963 - +
  • [5] Models of non-hospice palliative care: a review
    Beasley, Amy
    Bakitas, Marie A.
    Edwards, Rebecca
    Kavalieratos, Dio
    [J]. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 8 : S15 - S21
  • [6] Lack of Exposure to Palliative Care Training for Black Residents: A Study of Schools With Highest and Lowest Percentages of Black Enrollment
    Bell, Lindsay F.
    Livingston, Jessica
    Arnold, Robert M.
    Schenker, Yael
    Kelsey, Riba C.
    Ivonye, Chinedu
    October, Tessie W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 61 (05) : 1023 - 1027
  • [7] Using Experience-based Co-design with older patients, their families and staff to improve palliative care experiences in the Emergency Department: A reflective critique on the process and outcomes
    Blackwell, Rebecca Wright Nee
    Lowton, Karen
    Robert, Glenn
    Grudzen, Corita
    Grocott, Patricia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 68 : 83 - 94
  • [8] Experience-based design, co-design and experience-based co-design in palliative and end-of-life care
    Borgstrom, Erica
    Barclay, Stephen
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [9] Braun V., 2022, Thematic analysis: A practical guide, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
  • [10] Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Palliative Care Access in Rural Areas: A Scoping Review
    Cai, Yun
    Nasreen, Lalani
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (01) : 123 - 130