Development and Verification of Coupled Fluid-Structure Interaction Solver

被引:2
作者
Schemmel, Avery [1 ]
Palakurthy, Seshendra [2 ]
Zope, Anup [2 ]
Collins, Eric [2 ]
Bhushan, Shanti [3 ]
机构
[1] US Army, Corps Engineers, Vicksburg, MS 39180 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Ctr Adv Vehicular Syst, Starkville, MS 39759 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Starkville, MS 39759 USA
关键词
fluid-structure interaction; shock boundary layer interaction; transonic panel flutter; limit cycle oscillations; Hopf bifurcation; PANEL FLUTTER; AEROELASTIC STABILITY; OBLIQUE SHOCK; WING FLUTTER; PREDICTION; OSCILLATIONS; SIMULATIONS; FLOW;
D O I
10.3390/computation12060129
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Recent trends in aeroelastic analysis have shown a great interest in understanding the role of shock boundary layer interaction in predicting the dynamic instability of aircraft structural components at supersonic and hypersonic flows. The analysis of such complex dynamics requires a time-accurate fluid-structure interaction solver. This study focuses on the development of such a solver by coupling a finite-volume Navier-Stokes solver for fluid flow with a finite-element solver for structural dynamics. The coupled solver is then verified for the prediction of several panel instability cases in 2D and 3D uniform flows and in the presence of an impinging shock for a range of subsonic and supersonic Mach numbers, dynamic pressures, and shock strengths. The panel deflections and limit cycle oscillation amplitudes, frequencies, and bifurcation point predictions were compared within 10% of the benchmark results; thus, the solver was deemed verified. Future studies will focus on extending the solver to 3D turbulent flows and applying the solver to study the effect of turbulent load fluctuations and shock boundary layer interactions on the fluid-structure coupling and structural dynamics of 2D panels.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Overview of Computational Methods to Predict Flutter in Aircraft
    Antimirova, Ekaterina
    Jung, Jiyoung
    Zhang, Zilan
    Machuca, Aaron
    Gu, Grace X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2024, 91 (05):
  • [2] Babinsky H., 2011, Shock wave-boundary-layer interactions, P373, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511842757
  • [3] Bhatia M., 2018, 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, P1650
  • [4] Transonic Panel Flutter Predictions Using a Linearized Stability Formulation
    Bhatia, Manav
    Beran, Philip
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2017, 55 (10) : 3499 - 3516
  • [5] Features of panel flutter response to shock boundary layer interactions
    Boyer, Nathan R.
    McNamara, J. J.
    Gaitonde, D. V.
    Barnes, Caleb J.
    Visbal, Miguel R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2021, 101
  • [6] Features of shock-induced panel flutter in three-dimensional inviscid flow
    Boyer, Nathan R.
    McNamara, J. J.
    Gaitonde, D., V
    Barnes, Caleb J.
    Visbal, Miguel R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 83 : 490 - 506
  • [7] Enriched Piston Theory for Expedient Aeroelastic Loads Prediction in the Presence of Shock Impingements
    Brouwer, Kirk R.
    McNamara, Jack J.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (03) : 1288 - 1302
  • [8] Application of Navier-Stokes simulations for aeroelastic stability assessment in transonic regime
    Cavagna, Luca
    Quaranta, Giuseppe
    Mantegazza, Paolo
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2007, 85 (11-14) : 818 - 832
  • [9] Aeroelastic analysis and flutter control of wings and panels: A review
    Chai, Yuyang
    Gao, Wei
    Ankay, Benjamin
    Li, Fengming
    Zhang, Chuanzeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2021, 1 (01): : 5 - 34
  • [10] Numerical simulation of 3-D wing flutter with fully coupled fluid-structural interaction
    Chen, Xiangying
    Zha, Ge-Cheng
    Yang, Ming-Ta
    [J]. COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2007, 36 (05) : 856 - 867