Predictors for selection of outpatient single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Soputro, Nicolas A. [1 ]
Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana [1 ]
Chavali, Jaya S. [1 ]
Pedraza, Adriana M. [1 ]
Mikesell, Carter D. [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland Hts, OH USA
关键词
radical prostatectomy; minimally invasive surgical procedures; prostate cancer; single port; robotic surgery; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE; COMORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1111/bju.16483
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo evaluate the different perioperative variables that may serve as important clinical predictors when selecting patients for outpatient single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP).Patients and MethodsA retrospective review was performed on the Institutional Review Board-approved, prospectively maintained database to identify 485 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RARP between 2018 and 2023. A comparison analysis was performed on patients who were managed as outpatients vs inpatients following their respective SP-RARP. A separate analysis was performed after excluding patients with pre-planned admissions to identify the risk factors for unplanned admissions.ResultsAll procedures were successfully completed without any conversion or additional ports. After excluding patients with pre-planned admissions, outpatient SP-RARP was successfully achieved in 86.6% with a median (interquartile range) length of stay of 4.6 (3.8-6.1) hours. Our multivariate regression analysis identified cardiac comorbidity and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as predictors of outpatient SP-RARP. In addition, the absence of cardiac comorbidity, previous abdominal surgery, and lower postoperative pain score were protective against the risk of unplanned admission. Furthermore, both inpatient and outpatient encounters had comparable 90-day rates of postoperative complication (P = 0.136) and hospital re-admission (P = 0.942).ConclusionOutpatient management models could be successfully achieved in most patients who underwent SP-RARP (86.6%) while maintaining similarly low perioperative morbidity profile. Nevertheless, appropriate patient selection based on the baseline clinicodemographic characteristics remains essential to ensure the safety and ongoing success of outpatient SP-RARP.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 259
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predictors of prolonged operative time during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Yong, Daniel Z.
    Tsivian, Matvey
    Zilberman, Dorit E.
    Ferrandino, Michael N.
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    Albala, David M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (02) : 280 - 282
  • [22] Karolinska prostatectomy: A robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique
    Nilsson, Andreas E.
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Laven, Brett A.
    Wiklund, N. Peter
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 40 (06): : 453 - 458
  • [23] Initial experience of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon's experience with technique description
    Noh, Tae Il
    Tae, Jong Hyun
    Shim, Ji Sung
    Kang, Seok Ho
    Cheon, Jun
    Lee, Jeong Gu
    Kang, Sung Gu
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 10 (02) : 85 - 91
  • [24] Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description
    Kwon, Hyeok Jae
    Kang, San
    Rhew, Seung Ah
    Yoon, Chang Eil
    Shin, Dongho
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Moon, Hyong Woo
    Bae, Woong Jin
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    Ha, U-Syn
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Kim, Sae Woong
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 65 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [25] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855
  • [26] Single-Port vs Multiport Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Comparative Study
    Noh, Tae Il
    Kang, Young Jin
    Shim, Ji Sung
    Kang, Seok Ho
    Cheon, Jun
    Lee, Jeong Gu
    Kang, Sung Gu
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (05) : 661 - 667
  • [27] Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Bhat, Seetharam
    Onol, Fikret
    Rogers, Travis
    Patel, Vipul
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 127 (01) : 114 - 121
  • [28] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [29] EVOLUTION OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Patel, V. R.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 98 (02) : 76 - 88
  • [30] Single-port versus multi-port: will “one for all” ever become a new standard for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Riccardo Bertolo
    Chiara Cipriani
    Juan Garisto
    Pierluigi Bove
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 143 - 145