Animal factors that affect enteric methane production measured using the GreenFeed monitoring system in grazing dairy cows

被引:5
|
作者
Starsmore, K. [1 ,2 ]
Lopez-Villalobos, N. [2 ]
Shalloo, L. [1 ]
Egan, M. [1 ]
Burke, J. [2 ]
Lahart, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Teagasc Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Moorepark P31P302, Fermoy Co Cork, Ireland
[2] Massey Univ, Palmerston North 4442, Manawatu, New Zealand
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
enteric methane; grazing dairy cows; greenhouse gas emissions; methane yield; methane intensity; DRY-MATTER INTAKE; MILK UREA CONCENTRATION; PHENOTYPIC RELATIONSHIPS; MIXED RATION; EMISSIONS; REPEATABILITY; METABOLISM; MANAGEMENT; DIETARY; TRAITS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2023-23915
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Similar to all dairy systems internationally, pasturebased dairy systems are under increasing pressure to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Ireland and New Zealand are 2 countries operating predominantly pasture -based dairy production systems where enteric CH 4 contributes 23% and 36% of total national emissions, respectively. Ireland currently has a national commitment to reduce 51% of total GHG emissions by 2030 and 25% from agriculture by 2030, as well as striving to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. New Zealand's national commitment is to reduce 10% of methane emissions by 2030 and between 24% and 47% reduction in methane emissions by 2050. To achieve these reductions, factors that affect enteric methane (CH 4 ) production in a pasture -based system need to be investigated. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between enteric CH 4 and other animal traits (feed intake, metabolic liveweight, energy corrected milk yield, milk urea concentration, and body condition score [BCS]) in a grazing dairy system. Enteric CH 4 emissions were measured on 45 late lactation (213.8 +/- 29 d after calving) grazing Holstein -Friesian and Holstein -Friesian x Jersey crossbred cows (lactation number 3.01 +/- 1.65, 538.64 +/- 59.37 kg live weight, and 3.14 +/- 0.26 BCS) using GreenFeed monitoring equipment for 10 wk. There was a training period for the cows to use the GreenFeed of 3 wk before the 10wk study period. The average enteric CH 4 produced in the study was 352 g +/- 45.7 g per day with an animal to animal coefficient of variation of 13%. Dry matter intake averaged 16.6 kg +/- 2.23 kg per day, while milk solids (fat plus protein) averaged 1.62 kg +/- 0.29 kg per day. A multiple linear regression model indicated that each one unit increase in energy corrected milk yield, metabolic liveweight and milk urea concentration, resulted in an increase in enteric CH 4 production per day by 3.9, 1.74, and 1.38 g, respectively. Although each one unit increase in BCS resulted in a decrease in 39.03 g CH 4 produced per day. When combined, these factors explained 47% of the variation in CH 4 production, indicating that there is a large proportion of variation not included in the model. The repeatability of the CH 4 measurements was 0.66 indicating that cows are relatively consistently exhibiting the same level of CH 4 throughout the study. Therefore, enteric CH 4 production is suitable for phenotyping.
引用
收藏
页码:2930 / 2940
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring methane from grazing dairy cows using GreenFeed
    Waghorn, G. C.
    Jonker, A.
    Macdonald, K. A.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 252 - 257
  • [2] Estimating enteric methane and carbon dioxide emission from lactating dairy cows using GreenFeed system.
    Hailemariam, D.
    Manafiazar, G.
    Basarab, J.
    Miglior, F.
    Plastow, G.
    Wang, Z.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 182 - 182
  • [3] Heritability and genetic correlations between enteric methane production and concentration recorded by GreenFeed and sniffers on dairy cows
    van Breukelen, A. E.
    Aldridge, M. N.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    Koning, L.
    Sebek, L. B.
    de Haas, Y.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (06) : 4121 - 4132
  • [4] Does Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Production Affect Rumen Function and Animal Productivity in Dairy Cows?
    Veneman, Jolien B.
    Muetzel, Stefan
    Hart, Kenton J.
    Faulkner, Catherine L.
    Moorby, Jon M.
    Perdok, Hink B.
    Newbold, Charles J.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (10):
  • [5] Enteric methane emission can be reliably measured by the GreenFeed monitoring unit
    Huhtanen, P.
    Ramin, M.
    Hristov, A. N.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2019, 222 : 31 - 40
  • [6] Effects of concentrate supplementation on enteric methane emissions and milk production of grazing dairy cows
    Munoz, Camila
    Hube, Sara
    Morales, Jorge M.
    Yan, Tianhai
    Ungerfeld, Emilio M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2015, 175 : 37 - 46
  • [7] Short communication: Relationship of dry matter intake with enteric methane emission measured with the GreenFeed system in dairy cows receiving a diet without or with 3-nitrooxypropanol
    Hristov, A. N.
    Melgar, A.
    ANIMAL, 2020, 14 : S484 - S490
  • [8] A note on dairy cow behavior when measuring enteric methane emissions with the GreenFeed emission monitoring system in tiestalls
    Smith, Olivia A.
    Rochus, Christina M.
    Baes, Christine F.
    van Staaveren, Nienke
    JDS COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 5 (05):
  • [9] Prediction of enteric methane production from dairy cows
    Storlien, T. M.
    Volden, H.
    Almoy, T.
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    McAllister, T. A.
    Harstad, O. M.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 64 (02): : 98 - 109
  • [10] Short communication: Comparison of the GreenFeed system with the sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from dairy cows
    Hristov, A. N.
    Oh, J.
    Giallongo, F.
    Frederick, T.
    Harper, M. T.
    Weeks, H.
    Branco, A. F.
    Price, W. J.
    Moate, P. J.
    Deighton, M. H.
    Williams, S. R. O.
    Kindermann, M.
    Duval, S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (07) : 5461 - 5465