Robotic Lobectomy with a Single Robotic Stapler from One 12-mm Port: A Multi-institutional Study

被引:0
|
作者
Inoue, Yoshimasa [1 ]
Fujiu, Koichi [2 ]
Endo, Tetsuya [3 ]
Hamanaka, Rurika [4 ]
Tanaka, Hiroto [1 ]
Takei, Hidefumi [3 ]
Oda, Makoto [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Saiseikai Yokohama shi Tobu Hosp, Dept Gen Thorac Surg, Yokohama, Japan
[2] Southern Tohoku Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Thorac Surg, Koriyama, Japan
[3] Showa Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Chest Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Shin Yurigaoka Gen Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, 255 Furusawatuko,Asao Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2150026, Japan
来源
关键词
robotic lung resection; robotic stapler; postoperative pain; cost;
D O I
10.2302/kjm.2024-0003-OA
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction of the robotic stapler has allowed robotic lobectomy to be performed from a surgical console in complete autonomy. The robotic stapler fits a 12-mm port, which is larger than the standard 8-mm port and increases the risk of postoperative pain. However, in many cases, to cover all possible angles of approach, two 12-mm ports are preferably used. However, limiting instrument inventory and simplifying surgical procedures are also desirable to reduce costs. In a multicenter study, we assessed the feasibility of robotic lobectomy with a single type of robotic stapler [SureForm45 Curved-Tip (SF45C); Intuitive Surgical Inc.] inserted through one 12-mm port placed at the anterior tip of the lower intercostal space. We also investigated the potential cost savings of using an additional 60-mm stapler for interlobar division. A total of 135 lobectomy cases were enrolled. In all cases, all stapling procedures were completed using the SF45C inserted from the designated 12-mm port. We found that it was potentially less expensive to use the SureForm60 stapler if more than six SF45C reloads were needed for interlobar division. However, in our series, only 1 case (0.7%) met this requirement. The use of a single type of stapler from one 12-mm port in a robotic lobectomy is technically feasible. This approach may be expected to allow for surgical simplification, minimize the risk of postoperative pain, and reduce inventory costs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY OF ROBOTIC BUCCAL MUCOSA GRAFT URETEROPLASTY: INITAL RESULTS
    Zhao, Lee C.
    Yamaguchi, Yuka
    Bryk, Darren J.
    Maddox, Michael M.
    Powers, Mary K.
    Harbin, Andrew
    Lee, Ziho
    Giusto, Laura
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E339 - E339
  • [22] FACTORS LEADING TO CONVERSION FROM SINGLE PORT TO CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY
    Irwin, Brian H.
    Berger, Andre
    Tracy, Chad R.
    Branoina, Ricardo
    Goel, Raj K.
    White, Wesley M.
    Canes, David
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Kazumi, Kamoi
    Krouzet, Sebastien
    Monish, Aron
    Stein, Robert J.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    Rane, Abhay
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    Desai, Mihir M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 531 - 532
  • [23] Positive Surgical Margins After Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Orvieto, Marcelo
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Kameh, Darien
    Santoro, Luigi
    Coughlin, Geoff D.
    Liss, Michael
    Jeong, Wooju
    Malcolm, John
    Stern, Joshua M.
    Sharma, Saurabh
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Shikanov, Sergey
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Rha, Koon H.
    Albala, David M.
    Fabrizio, Michael D.
    Lee, David I.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02): : 511 - 516
  • [24] PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE
    Saidian, Ava
    Fang, Andrew
    Hakim, Ornin
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E900 - E901
  • [25] PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS OF SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE-INSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON ANALYSIS
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Mikesell, Carter
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E604 - E604
  • [26] Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with Baseline Renal Insufficiency: A Multi-Institutional Study
    Kaczmarek, B.
    Bhayani, S.
    Stifelman, M.
    Kaouk, J.
    Allaf, M.
    Tanagho, Y.
    Hillyer, S.
    Mullins, J.
    Rogers, C.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S57 - S58
  • [27] Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients
    Sooriakumaran, P.
    John, M.
    Wiklund, P.
    Lee, D.
    Nilsson, A.
    Tewari, A. K.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2011, 63 (03) : 191 - 198
  • [28] Strategies for success: a multi-institutional study on robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal lesions
    Bolton, D.
    Moon, D.
    Hennessey, D.
    Wei, G.
    Lawrentschuk, N.
    Kinnear, N.
    Davis, N.
    Chan, Y.
    Quinlan, M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 : 54 - 55
  • [29] Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients without Hilar Clamping: A Multi-Institutional Study
    Kaczmarek, B.
    Kaouk, J.
    Bhayani, S.
    Allaf, M.
    Stifelman, M.
    Tanagho, Y.
    Hillyer, S.
    Mullins, J.
    Rogers, C.
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (03) : S19 - S19
  • [30] SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL VS TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL MATCHED-PAIR COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Moschovas, Marcio
    Morgantini, Luca
    Hemal, Sij
    Talamini, Susan
    Joseph, Jean
    Kim, Moses
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Patel, Vipul
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E918 - E919