Systemic Importance and Risk Characteristics of Banks Based on a Multi-Layer Financial Network Analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Qianqian [1 ]
Fan, Hong [2 ]
Yu, Chengyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Financial Technol, Shanghai 201209, Peoples R China
[2] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai 200051, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
systemic risk; PageRank algorithm; network; centrality; risk exposure; CONTAGION; TOPOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/e26050378
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Domestic and international risk shocks have greatly increased the demand for systemic risk management in China. This paper estimates China's multi-layer financial network based on multiple financial relationships among banks, assets, and firms, using China's banking system data in 2021. An improved PageRank algorithm is proposed to identify systemically important banks and other economic sectors, and a stress test is conducted. This study finds that China's multi-layer financial network is sparse, and the distribution of transactions across financial markets is uneven. Regulatory authorities should support economic recovery and adjust the money supply, while banks should differentiate competition and manage risks better. Based on the PageRank index, this paper assesses the systemic importance of large commercial banks from the perspective of network structure, emphasizing the role of banks' transaction behavior and market participation. Different industries and asset classes are also assessed, suggesting that increased attention should be paid to industry risks and regulatory oversight of bank investments. Finally, stress tests confirm that the improved PageRank algorithm is applicable within the multi-layer financial network, reinforcing the need for prudential supervision of the banking system and revealing that the degree of transaction concentration will affect the systemic importance of financial institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A financial network perspective of financial institutions' systemic risk contributions
    Huang, Wei-Qiang
    Zhuang, Xin-Tian
    Yao, Shuang
    Uryasev, Stan
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2016, 456 : 183 - 196
  • [32] Jump volatility spillover network based measurement of systemic importance of Chinese financial institutions
    Yang, Xin
    Chen, Shan
    Liu, Hong
    Yang, Xiaoguang
    Huang, Chuangxia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2023, 28 (02) : 1201 - 1213
  • [33] Systemic risk network of Chinese financial institutions
    Fang, Libing
    Sun, Boyang
    Li, Huijing
    Yu, Honghai
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2018, 35 : 190 - 206
  • [34] Diversification and Systemic Risk: A Financial Network Perspective
    Frey, Ruediger
    Hledik, Juraj
    RISKS, 2018, 6 (02):
  • [35] Financial Structure and Systemic Risk of Banks: Evidence from Chinese Reform
    Ji, Guseon
    Kim, Daniel Sungyeon
    Ahn, Kwangwon
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (13):
  • [36] Systemic importance of financial services and insurance sectors: a world input–output network analysis
    Tao Sun
    The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2024, 49 : 63 - 96
  • [37] Assessing the contribution of banks, insurance and other financial services to systemic risk
    Bernal, Oscar
    Gnabo, Jean-Yves
    Guilmin, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2014, 47 : 270 - 287
  • [38] Random fixed points, systemic risk and resilience of heterogeneous financial network
    Indrajit Saha
    Veeraruna Kavitha
    Annals of Operations Research, 2024, 336 : 383 - 433
  • [39] Network centrality measures and systemic risk: An application to the Turkish financial crisis
    Kuzubas, Tolga Umut
    Omercikoglu, Inci
    Saltoglu, Burak
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2014, 405 : 203 - 215
  • [40] Random fixed points, systemic risk and resilience of heterogeneous financial network
    Saha, Indrajit
    Kavitha, Veeraruna
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 336 (1-2) : 383 - 433