Systemic Importance and Risk Characteristics of Banks Based on a Multi-Layer Financial Network Analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Qianqian [1 ]
Fan, Hong [2 ]
Yu, Chengyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Financial Technol, Shanghai 201209, Peoples R China
[2] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai 200051, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
systemic risk; PageRank algorithm; network; centrality; risk exposure; CONTAGION; TOPOLOGY;
D O I
10.3390/e26050378
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Domestic and international risk shocks have greatly increased the demand for systemic risk management in China. This paper estimates China's multi-layer financial network based on multiple financial relationships among banks, assets, and firms, using China's banking system data in 2021. An improved PageRank algorithm is proposed to identify systemically important banks and other economic sectors, and a stress test is conducted. This study finds that China's multi-layer financial network is sparse, and the distribution of transactions across financial markets is uneven. Regulatory authorities should support economic recovery and adjust the money supply, while banks should differentiate competition and manage risks better. Based on the PageRank index, this paper assesses the systemic importance of large commercial banks from the perspective of network structure, emphasizing the role of banks' transaction behavior and market participation. Different industries and asset classes are also assessed, suggesting that increased attention should be paid to industry risks and regulatory oversight of bank investments. Finally, stress tests confirm that the improved PageRank algorithm is applicable within the multi-layer financial network, reinforcing the need for prudential supervision of the banking system and revealing that the degree of transaction concentration will affect the systemic importance of financial institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complex risk contagions among large international energy firms: A multi-layer network analysis
    Wu, Fei
    Xiao, Xuanqi
    Zhou, Xinyu
    Zhang, Dayong
    Ji, Qiang
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 114
  • [22] Risk sharing framework and systemic tolerance in Indian banks: Double layer network approach
    Banerjee, Ameet Kumar
    Rahman, Molla Ramizur
    Misra, Arun Kumar
    Sensoy, Ahmet
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2025, 73
  • [23] Network Analysis of SIFIs Based on Tail Systemic Linkage
    Tan, Keqi
    Chen, Yu
    Liao, Yujie
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2022, 10
  • [24] Systemic risk in financial institutions: A multiplex network approach
    Xie, Yiwei
    Jiao, Feng
    Li, Shihan
    Liu, Qingfu
    Tse, Yiuman
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 73
  • [25] Financial network structure and systemic risk
    Huang, Chuangxia
    Deng, Yanchen
    Yang, Xiaoguang
    Cai, Yaqian
    Yang, Xin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2024, 30 (10) : 1073 - 1096
  • [26] Systemic risk and macro-financial contagion in China: financial balance sheet-based network analysis
    Sun, Lixin
    JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2023, 28 (03) : 1140 - 1173
  • [27] Tail risk network analysis of Asian banks
    Pham, Thach N.
    Powell, Robert
    Bannigidadmath, Deepa
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 62
  • [28] Identifying the systemic importance and systemic vulnerability of financial institutions based on portfolio similarity correlation network
    Manjin Shao
    Hong Fan
    EPJ Data Science, 13
  • [29] Measuring systemic risk: A financial statement-based approach for insurance firms and banks
    Peddireddy, Venkat
    Rajgopal, Shiva
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2025, 42 (01) : 490 - 524
  • [30] A survey of network-based analysis and systemic risk measurement
    Neveu, Andre R.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INTERACTION AND COORDINATION, 2018, 13 (02) : 241 - 281