PHANTOM LIMB PAIN RATING SCALE: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY

被引:0
作者
Katran, Hamdiye Banu [1 ]
Akyuz, Nuray [2 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Surg Dis Nursing, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Univ Cerrahpasa, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing, Dept Surg Dis Nursing, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES | 2024年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
Amputation; Pain Measurement; Phantom limb pain; Scale; Pain; VIRTUAL-REALITY; MANAGEMENT; AMPUTEES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.30621/jbachs.1374244
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable scale to evaluate and measure phantom limb pain. Material and Methods: This study, which was designed in a methodological type, was conducted with a total of 258 patients. A demographics form and a draft scale developed by the research authors were used to collect the study data. Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 was used to provide descriptive statistics and reliability analyses for the study data. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used in the development of the phantom limb pain rating scale, and Reliability and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were used for the study's validity and reliability evaluations. Results: The Kuder-Richardson 20 value, which shows the internal consistency of the questions of the 16 -item the rating scale, was found to be 0.921. The total score of the rating scale ranged from 1 to 16, with an average of 11.19 +/- 4.94. It was determined that the fit criterias and corrected chi-square values showed acceptable fit, and that the scale was both statistically significant and valid (p=0.001; p<0.01). Conclusion: The self-reported scale developed in this study was found to be a reliable and valid measurement tool for evaluating phantom limb pain in affected patients.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 422
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Effect of variance ratio on ANOVA robustness: Might 1.5 be the limit? [J].
Blanca, Maria J. ;
Alarcon, Rafael ;
Arnau, Jaume ;
Bono, Roser ;
Bendayan, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (03) :937-962
[2]  
Brown TA., 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[3]   PHANTOM LIMB PAIN RELIEF BY CONTRALATERAL MYOFASCIAL INJECTION WITH LOCAL ANAESTHETIC IN A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY: PRELIMINARY RESULTS [J].
Casale, Roberto ;
Ceccherelli, Francesco ;
Labeeb, Alaa Abd Elaziz Mohamed ;
Biella, Gabriele E. M. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (06) :418-422
[4]   Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments [J].
Clark, Lee Anna ;
Watson, David .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2019, 31 (12) :1412-1427
[5]   Exploratory findings with virtual reality for phantom limb pain; from stump motion to agency and analgesia [J].
Cole, Jonathan ;
Crowle, Simon ;
Austwick, Greg ;
Slater, David Henderson .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (10) :846-854
[6]   Neuropathic pain [J].
Colloca, Luana ;
Ludman, Taylor ;
Bouhassira, Didier ;
Baron, Ralf ;
Dickenson, AnthonyH. ;
Yarnitsky, David ;
Freeman, Roy ;
Truini, Andrea ;
Attal, Nadine ;
Finnerup, Nanna B. ;
Eccleston, Christopher ;
Kalso, Eija ;
Bennett, David L. ;
Dworkin, RobertH. ;
Raja, Srinivasa N. .
NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS, 2017, 3
[7]   Mirrored, imagined and executed movements differentially activate sensorimotor cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain [J].
Diers, Martin ;
Christmann, Christoph ;
Koeppe, Caroline ;
Ruf, Matthias ;
Flor, Herta .
PAIN, 2010, 149 (02) :296-304
[8]   Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: Results of a national survey [J].
Ephraim, PL ;
Wegener, ST ;
MacKenzie, EJ ;
Dillingham, TR ;
Pezzin, LE .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (10) :1910-1919
[9]   Phantom Limb Pain After Lower Limb Trauma: Origins and Treatments [J].
Foell, Jens ;
Bekrater-Bodmann, Robin ;
Flor, Herta ;
Cole, Jonathan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOWER EXTREMITY WOUNDS, 2011, 10 (04) :224-235
[10]   Item Removal Strategies Conducted in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Comparative Study [J].
Guvendir, Meltem Acar ;
Ozkan, Yesim Ozer .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 9 (01) :165-180