A comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using SUOER SW-500 rebound tonometer and conventional reusable Goldmann prisms

被引:1
|
作者
Chaung, Jia Quan [1 ,2 ]
Sangapillai, Thanendthire [1 ]
Quilat, Karen Kate [1 ]
Perera, Shamira [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore City, Singapore
[2] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore City, Singapore
[3] Duke NUS Med Sch, Singapore City, Singapore
关键词
glaucoma; rebound tonometer; IOP; intraocular pressure; Goldmann applanation tonometry; APPLANATION TONOMETER; ICARE; GLAUCOMA; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2024.1269332
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: To determine the agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using conventional Goldmann applanation tonometry (GA(1,2)T) and SUOER SW-500 Rebound Tonometer. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study where 205 eyes of 106 glaucoma patients had their IOPs measured by 2 fellowship trained ophthalmologists. Data were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method of differences. Correlation was measured using the Pearson coefficient. Results: Most of our patients were Chinese (88.7%) and female (51.9%). The average age was 66.9 years. The range of IOPs as measured by GAT was 2 to 58 mm Hg. Using the Bland-Altman method to compare GAT and SUOER SW-500 Rebound Tonometer. The tonometer overestimated the IOP by 0.5 mm Hg in the right eye and underestimated it by 0.1 mm Hg in the left eye. Overall, the tonometer overestimated the IOP by 0.2 mmHg. The Tonometer IOP correlated well with GAT, with a Pearson coefficient of correlation(r) of 0.89 (p < 0.001) for the right eye and 0.86 (p < 0.001) for the left eye, respectively. In patients with GAT IOP >= 21 mm Hg (n = 25), the Tonometer underestimated the IOP by 2.96 mm Hg. Discussion: The IOP measurements from the SUOER SW-500 Rebound Tonometer correlates well with the conventional GAT in measuring the IOP within normal ranges of IOP. SUOER SW-500 Rebound Tonometer may be of use, especially if the risk of transmission of infection is high considering that the probes are disposable. It is easy to use and its small size and portability makes it useful in situations where the patient is unable to be examined at the slit lamp.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Applanation Tonometry Using Conventional Reusable Goldmann Prisms and Disposable Prisms
    Tsai, Andrew S. H.
    How, Alicia C.
    Su, Daniel H. W.
    Lee, Kelvin Y.
    Wong, Tina T.
    Perera, Shamira A.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (08) : 521 - 525
  • [2] Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients
    Valero, B.
    Fenolland, J. -R.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Sendon, D.
    Mesnard, C.
    Sigaux, M.
    Giraud, J. -M.
    Renard, J. -P.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2017, 40 (10): : 865 - 875
  • [3] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility With the Portable ICare Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients
    Salim, Sarwat
    Du, Haiming
    Wan, Jim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (04) : 325 - 329
  • [4] A comparison of postural and diurnal variations in intraocular pressure using the iCare rebound tonometer and Perkins applanation tonometer in admitted adults in Kenya
    Chikasirimobi, Timothy G.
    Ndinyo, Mercy
    Ondieki, Maxine N.
    Miti, Isaac
    Ejiochi-Iyoke, Ndidi J.
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    Zeried, Ferial M.
    Agho, Kingsley
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Mashige, Khathutshelo P.
    AFRICAN VISION AND EYE HEALTH JOURNAL, 2021, 80 (01):
  • [5] Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry
    Kim, C. Y.
    Kuehn, M. H.
    Anderson, M. G.
    Kwon, Y. H.
    EYE, 2007, 21 (09) : 1202 - 1209
  • [6] Comparison of intraocular pressure in healthy brachycephalic and nonbrachycephalic cats using the Icare® TONOVET Plus rebound tonometer
    Kerdchuchuen, Kamolchanok
    Samathayanon, Kingkarn
    Phientong, Pitchapa
    Chattraphirat, Suprapha
    Jaturakan, Orapun
    Tuntivanich, Nalinee
    VETERINARY OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 24 (05) : 484 - 490
  • [7] Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry
    C Y Kim
    M H Kuehn
    M G Anderson
    Y H Kwon
    Eye, 2007, 21 : 1202 - 1209
  • [8] Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
    Nakakura, Shunsuke
    Mori, Etsuko
    Fujio, Yuki
    Fujisawa, Yasuko
    Matsuya, Kanae
    Kobayashi, Yui
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    Asaoka, Ryo
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2019, 28 (02) : 172 - 177
  • [9] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects
    Guler, Mete
    Bilak, Semsettin
    Bilgin, Burak
    Simsek, Ali
    Capkin, Musa
    Reyhan, Ali Hakim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (08) : 613 - 618
  • [10] Postural Change in Intraocular Pressure: A Comparison of Measurement With a Goldmann Tonometer, Tonopen XL, Pneumatonometer, and HA-2
    Barkana, Yaniv
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (01) : E23 - E28