Amphibian conservation status in Brazil: Spatial patterns, threats, and challenges

被引:0
作者
Anunciacao, P. R. [1 ,2 ]
Valencia-Zuleta, A. [1 ,3 ]
Signorelli, L. [1 ]
Martins, M. [4 ]
Bastos, R. P. [3 ]
Bataus, Y. [1 ]
Guidorizzi, C. E. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Setor Leste Univ, Inst Chico Mendes Conservacao Biodiversidade RAN I, Ctr Nacl Pesquisa & Conservacao Repteis & Anfibios, Rua 229,95, BR-74605090 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Senckenberg Nat Hist Collect Dresden, Museum Zool, Konigsbrucker Landstr 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany
[3] Univ Fed Goias, Dept Ecol, Inst Ciencias Biol, Esperanca s-n,Campus Samambaia, BR-74690900 Goiania, GO, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Ecol, Inst Biociencias, Rua Matao,Travessa 14,101 Cidade Univ, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Goias, Programa Posgrad Biodiversidade Anim, Ave Esperanca S-N,ICB V Campus Samambaia, BR- 74690900 Goiania, GO, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Red list; Amphibian conservation; Risk assessment; Conservation planning; IUCN; EX-SITU CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREAS; ADVERTISEMENT CALL; ANURA BUFONIDAE; HABITAT SPLIT; DECLINES; HYLIDAE; FOREST; LEPTODACTYLIDAE; CARAMASCHI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126611
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Extinction risk assessments are valuable conservation tools, especially for sensitive groups like amphibians, which are facing escalating threats from habitat loss and degradation. In this scenario, Brazil stands out as a pivotal player in amphibian conservation due to its exceptional amphibian diversity. Between 2010 and 2014, 973 amphibian species were assessed in Brazil. More recently, from 2017 to 2018, this number increased to 1096. In this study, we (1) compare the extinction risk status of Brazilian amphibians between the 1st and 2nd assessments; (2) evaluate the reasons for changes in status; (3) identify the main threats and research recommendations; and (4) analyze the spatial patterns of threatened species in relation to protected areas and ecoregions in Brazil. Our findings reveal an increase in the number of threatened species from the first to the second assessment. The categories of Least Concern and Critically Endangered experienced the most significant increases, with 169 and 16 more species, respectively, while the count of Data Deficient species dropped by 71. The primary factor contributing to these changes is the availability of new, more precise information, affecting 134 species, or 85.4% of the cases. Threatened species are predominantly clustered within the Atlantic Forest biome, itself the most endangered biome in Brazil, hosting 46 species, or 78% of the total. Notably, one-third of threatened species in Brazil do not inhabit protected areas and thus require immediate conservation attention. While substantial progress has been made in understanding Brazilian amphibians in recent years, an urgent need persists for fundamental research. This research should encompass taxonomy, natural history, and the evaluation of threat impacts, providing a robust foundation for more effective conservation efforts concerning this group.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [11] Habitat Split as a Cause of Local Population Declines of Amphibians with Aquatic Larvae
    Becker, C. Guilherme
    Fonseca, Carlos R.
    Haddad, Celio F. B.
    Prado, Paulo I.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (01) : 287 - 294
  • [12] Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians
    Becker, Carlos Guilherme
    Fonseca, Carlos Roberto
    Baptista Haddad, Celio Fernando
    Batista, Romulo Fernandes
    Prado, Paulo Inacio
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2007, 318 (5857) : 1775 - 1777
  • [13] A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species
    Betts, Jessica
    Young, Richard P.
    Hilton-Taylor, Craig
    Hoffmann, Michael
    Rodriguez, Jon Paul
    Stuart, Simon N.
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2020, 34 (03) : 632 - 643
  • [14] Land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from 1990 to 2010 based on a systematic remote sensing sampling approach
    Beuchle, Rene
    Grecchi, Rosana Cristina
    Shimabukuro, Yosio Edemir
    Seliger, Roman
    Eva, Hugh Douglas
    Sano, Edson
    Achard, Frederic
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 58 : 116 - 127
  • [15] Bivand R., 2022, rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine - Open Source ('GEOS'). R package version, (5), P9
  • [16] Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring
    Bohmann, Kristine
    Evans, Alice
    Gilbert, M. Thomas P.
    Carvalho, Gary R.
    Creer, Simon
    Knapp, Michael
    Yu, Douglas W.
    de Bruyn, Mark
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (06) : 358 - 367
  • [17] Bokermann W. C. A., 1956, Neotropica, V2, P81
  • [18] A functional perspective for global amphibian conservation
    Bolochio, Bruna E.
    Lescano, Julian N.
    Cordier, Javier Maximiliano
    Loyola, Rafael
    Nori, Javier
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 245
  • [19] Bornschein M. R., 2016, PeerJ, V2490, P1
  • [20] Three New Species of Phytotelm-Breeding Melanophryniscus from the Atlantic Rainforest of Southern Brazil (Anura: Bufonidae)
    Bornschein, Marcos R.
    Firkowski, Carina R.
    Baldo, Diego
    Ribeiro, Luiz F.
    Belmonte-Lopes, Ricardo
    Correa, Leandro
    Morato, Sergio A. A.
    Pie, Marcio R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):