Physician's comfort level with observing ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a survey of breast specialists at accredited breast centers in the United States

被引:3
作者
Poli, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
Chang, Cecilia [2 ]
Bleicher, Richard J. [3 ]
Moran, Meena [4 ]
Dietz, Jill [5 ]
Sarantou, Terry [6 ]
Kurtzman, Scott [7 ]
Yao, Katharine A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Surg Oncol, Houston, TX USA
[2] NorthShore Univ HealthSyst, NorthShore Res Inst, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Yale Med, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Carolinas Med Syst, Dept Surg, Charlotte, NC USA
[7] Waterbury Hosp & Hlth Ctr, Dept Surg, Waterbury, CT USA
[8] NorthShore Univ HealthSyst, Dept Surg, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
Breast cancer; ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); active surveillance; LOCAL RECURRENCE; LOW-RISK; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; BIOPSY; TRIAL; OVERTREATMENT; FEASIBILITY; POPULATION; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.21037/abs-22-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Ongoing clinical trials are investigating the role of observation for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to assess breast specialist's opinions on observing DCIS and recruitment to trials that involve observation of DCIS. Methods: A cross-sectional survey assessing physician opinions on observation of DCIS and knowledge of DCIS recurrence rates was administered to physicians practicing at breast centers accredited by the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC) from 2018-2019. Results: Three hundred and seventy-nine out of 603 NAPBC centers (63%) participated and 979 out of 1,761 (56%) physicians responded. Three hundred (32%) were medical oncologists, 316 (33.7%) were radiation oncologists and 322 (34.3%) were surgeons. Only 301 (31.1%) physicians were categorized into the high knowledge group. In total, 659 physicians (70.7%) estimated that <20% of their patients could be initially observed and 746 (76.5%) felt it would be somewhat to very difficult to recruit patients to a DCIS observation trial. The top three most important reasons for not participating in a DCIS observation trial were: concerns for high risk of disease progression (n=540, 57.0%), worry about tumor upstaging seen with surgery (n=422, 44.3%) and patient unwillingness to consent (n=401, 42.6%). On multivariable analysis, there were no physician or knowledge factors associated with comfort level of observing low-grade or estrogen receptor positive DCIS. Conclusions: Many physicians are hesitant to observe patients with DCIS. Knowledge levels about recurrence rates with DCIS are low but knowledge level was not associated with physician comfort level in putting patients on DCIS observation trials.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Boyages J, 1999, CANCER, V85, P616, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990201)85:3<616::AID-CNCR12>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-Z
[3]   Ductal Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Biopsy: Meta-Analysis of Underestimation and Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer [J].
Brennan, Meagan E. ;
Turner, Robin M. ;
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Marinovich, M. Luke ;
French, James R. ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 260 (01) :119-128
[4]   Outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ untreated after diagnostic biopsy - Results from the Nurses' Health Study [J].
Collins, LC ;
Tamimi, RM ;
Baer, HJ ;
Connolly, JL ;
Colditz, GA ;
Schnitt, SJ .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (09) :1778-1784
[5]   Recommendations for prioritization, treatment, and triage of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. the COVID-19 pandemic breast cancer consortium [J].
Dietz, Jill R. ;
Moran, Meena S. ;
Isakoff, Steven J. ;
Kurtzman, Scott H. ;
Willey, Shawna C. ;
Burstein, Harold J. ;
Bleicher, Richard J. ;
Lyons, Janice A. ;
Sarantou, Terry ;
Baron, Paul L. ;
Stevens, Randy E. ;
Boolbol, Susan K. ;
Anderson, Benjamin O. ;
Shulman, Lawrence N. ;
Gradishar, William J. ;
Monticciolo, Debra L. ;
Plecha, Donna M. ;
Nelson, Heidi ;
Yao, Katharine A. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 181 (03) :487-497
[6]   Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study [J].
Elshof, Lotte E. ;
Tryfonidis, Konstantinos ;
Slaets, Leen ;
van Leeuwen-Stok, A. Elise ;
Skinner, Victoria P. ;
Dif, Nicolas ;
Pijnappel, Ruud M. ;
Bijker, Nina ;
Rutgers, Emiel J. Th. ;
Wesseling, Jelle .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (12) :1497-1510
[7]   Rethinking the Standard for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment [J].
Esserman, Laura ;
Yau, Christina .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (07) :881-883
[8]   Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change [J].
Esserman, Laura J. ;
Thompson, Ian M. ;
Reid, Brian ;
Nelson, Peter ;
Ransohoff, David F. ;
Welch, H. Gilbert ;
Hwang, Shelley ;
Berry, Donald A. ;
Kinzler, Kenneth W. ;
Black, William C. ;
Bissell, Mina ;
Parnes, Howard ;
Srivastava, Sudhir .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (06) :E234-E242
[9]   The LORIS Trial: Addressing Overtreatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ [J].
Francis, A. ;
Fallowfield, L. ;
Rea, D. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01) :6-8
[10]   Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial [J].
Francis, Adele ;
Thomas, Jeremy ;
Fallowfield, Lesley ;
Wallis, Matthew ;
Bartlett, John M. S. ;
Brookes, Cassandra ;
Roberts, Tracy ;
Pirrie, Sarah ;
Gaunt, Claire ;
Young, Jennie ;
Billingham, Lucinda ;
Dodwell, David ;
Hanby, Andrew ;
Pinder, Sarah E. ;
Evans, Andrew ;
Reed, Malcolm ;
Jenkins, Valerie ;
Matthews, Lucy ;
Wilcox, Maggie ;
Fairbrother, Patricia ;
Bowden, Sarah ;
Rea, Daniel .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 51 (16) :2296-2303