Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of partition walls: Innovative prefabricated systems vs conventional construction

被引:4
作者
Meireles, Ines [1 ]
Martin-Gamboa, Mario [2 ]
Sousa, Vitor [3 ]
Kalthoum, Ahmad [1 ]
Dufour, Javier [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aveiro, Campus Univ Santiago, Dept Civil Engn, RISCO, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
[2] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Chem & Environm Engn Grp, Mostoles 28933, Spain
[3] Univ Lisbon, IST, Dept Civil Engn, CERIS, Av Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Non -volumetric prefabrication; Off -site construction; Pre; -assembly; Industrialized building; Partition wall; Innovative building element; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; EMBODIED ENERGY; BUILDINGS; LCA; DESIGN; SECTOR; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100179
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Prefabrication is increasingly recognized as an alternative to conventional on-site construction, offering potential environmental benefits. However, these benefits are context-specific, requiring precise studies for optimal solutions. This paper presents the life-cycle environmental performance of an innovative prefabricated interior partition wall and benchmarks it against a conventional system, providing a replicable model for other novel partition walls. Detailed data collected directly from direct sources were utilized to conduct a cradle-to-gate with options Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), presenting a conveniently described method that can be widely replicated in the construction sector. The adapted LCA method presented in this study contributes to sustainable construction, providing a straightforward and robust approach to assessing the environmental impacts of innovative partition walls compared to conventional walls. For the specific scenario studied, the life-cycle impact assessment results generally indicate a superior environmental performance of the innovative prefabricated interior partition wall compared to the conventional system, resulting in impact reductions ranging from 10 to 60% across evaluated categories. For both systems, the production of materials plays a predominant role in the impact contributions. Furthermore, exploring alternative scenarios yielded significant environmental benefits, particularly in cases considering higher incorporation of recycled materials. Therefore, the direct comparison of the environmental performance of innovative partition walls against traditional solutions emerges as an environmentally sustainable path in the short and medium term. This aligns with the ongoing progress towards decarbonizing the building sector, not only in choosing more environmentally friendly solutions but also in improving the environmental performance of products through assertive changes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [61] Prefabricated versus conventional construction: Comparing life-cycle impacts of alternative structural materials
    Tavares, V.
    Soares, N.
    Raposo, N.
    Marques, P.
    Freire, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 41
  • [62] Embodied energy and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of a prefabricated modular house: The "Moby" case study
    Tavares, Vanessa
    Lacerda, Nuno
    Freire, Fausto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 : 1044 - 1053
  • [63] Environmental assessments of scales: The effect of ex-ante and ex-post data on life cycle assessment of wood torrefaction
    Tsalidis, Georgios Archimidis
    Korevaar, Gijsbert
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 176
  • [64] Upscaling methods used in ex ante life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: a review
    Tsoy, Natalya
    Steubing, Bernhard
    van der Giesen, Coen
    Guinee, Jeroen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (09) : 1680 - 1692
  • [65] United Nations, 2015, The Paris Agreement
  • [66] A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice
    van der Giesen, Coen
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Guinee, Jeroen
    Kramer, Gert Jan
    Tukker, Arnold
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [67] The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology
    Wernet, Gregor
    Bauer, Christian
    Steubing, Bernhard
    Reinhard, Jurgen
    Moreno-Ruiz, Emilia
    Weidema, Bo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (09) : 1218 - 1230
  • [68] Optimised design of energy efficient building facades via Evolutionary Neural Networks
    Zemella, Giovanni
    De March, Davide
    Borrotti, Matteo
    Poli, Irene
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2011, 43 (12) : 3297 - 3302
  • [69] Life cycle greenhouse gas emission and cost analysis of prefabricated concrete building facade elements
    Zhang, Chunbo
    Hu, Mingming
    Yang, Xining
    Amati, Arianna
    Tukker, Arnold
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 24 (05) : 1016 - 1030