A fuzzy approach to environmental scanning (ES) of multi-factor bottlenecks to renewable rural energy sustainability in Nepal

被引:0
作者
Chapagai, Durga Prasad [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Neeta Dhusia [2 ]
Roy, Amit Kumar [3 ]
Roy, Manish Kumar [4 ]
机构
[1] Pokhara Univ, Sch Business, Pokhara, Nepal
[2] Sikkim Manipal Inst Technol, Dept Management Studies, Majhitar, India
[3] Sikkim Manipal Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Majhitar, India
[4] Sikkim Manipal Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Majhitar, India
关键词
Environmental scanning; Fuzzy AHP; Energy bottlenecks; Sustainability; Factor analysis; Rural energy; BARRIERS; TECHNOLOGIES; IMPLEMENTATION; PERSPECTIVE; ASIA;
D O I
10.1080/15567249.2024.2384544
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Due to the prevalence of traditional fuels and the increasing awareness of their negative effects on sustainability, policymakers and government authorities in Nepal have been compelled to transition towards promoting the adoption of clean energy. Nevertheless, as a result of numerous obstacles, the rate of renewable energy utilization has remained sluggish. Therefore, the country's policymakers must become acquainted with the factors that impede the progress of renewable energy. The objective is to pinpoint the constraints, restrictions, and barriers that hinder the advancement of renewable energy access to rural communities in Nepal. The current study used the Delphi Technique of Environmental Scanning to identify the barriers impeding the adoption of renewable energy. In addition, an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed to redefine categories of bottlenecks depending on the direction of the factors in the context of Nepal. Ultimately, the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process (FAHP) has been employed to determine the priority of distinct bottlenecks of clean energy development. The study suggests that Nepal's advancement in sustainable energy is hindered by financial obstacles, primarily due to the significant initial investment, which accounts for 19% of the challenges, and the lack of effective fiscal incentives provided by the government to developers and users, which accounts for 10.6% of the challenges. The research identified many contributory reasons, including the function of regulatory organizations (6.4%), inadequate political commitments (6%), inefficient existing energy policy (5%), and poor public knowledge (5%). To promote the development of sustainable energy sources in rural areas, it is crucial to implement economic incentives, provide financial support, establish partnerships between the public and private sectors, and utilize innovative financing methods such as green bonds, crowdfunding, and carbon financing. Additionally, it is necessary to increase political commitments to amend existing renewable energy policies in the country.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Assessment of solar energy technologies in Africa-opportunities and challenges in meeting the 2030 agenda and sustainable development goals
    Adenle, Ademola A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 137
  • [2] Adhikari M., 2017, P IOE GRAD C
  • [3] Factors affecting access to clean cooking fuel among rural households in India during COVID-19 pandemic
    Ali, Jabir
    Khan, Waseem
    [J]. ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 67 : 102 - 111
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, Economic Survey
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, WORLD BANK ANN REPOR
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2022, United Nations, Reports.
  • [7] Exploring the barriers to renewable energy adoption utilising MULTIMOORA- EDAS method
    Asante, Dennis
    He, Zheng
    Adjei, Nana Osae
    Asante, Bismark
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 142 (142)
  • [8] An integrated management systems approach to corporate sustainability
    Asif, Muhammad
    Searcy, Cory
    Zutshi, Ambika
    Ahmad, Niaz
    [J]. EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2011, 23 (04) : 353 - 367
  • [9] Babatunde BO., 2012, Economic Insights-Trends Challenges, VLXIV, P24
  • [10] Rural energy in developing countries: A challenge for economic development
    Barnes, DF
    Floor, WM
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 21 : 497 - 530